A decade ago, this image went mega-viral on Google+. In the ensuing years, it has been adapted and reused thousands of times.

@cra1g created this instantly viral image and tells the story of its evolution here:
https://medium.com/@CRA1G/the-evolution-of-an-accidental-meme-ddc4e139e0e4
@sociology @politicalscience

The Evolution of an Accidental Meme - Craig Froehle - Medium

My jaw hit the keyboard…that was my image, but it also wasn’t my image. It was the concept behind my image, but completely redrawn (and by someone with actual artistic talent!). I was stunned…and…

Medium
@conradhackett @cra1g @sociology @politicalscience Interesting. When I first encountered this graphic, the image on the left was titled "Equality," and the image on the right was titled "Equity."
@parallelarts That was someone else's relabeling of the image, which kicked off my scholarly interests in organizational justice. Equity has traditionally been used to mean allocation proportional to someone's contributions or merits, but it's more recently caught traction to mean proportional to one's needs. I suspect this meme is partly why.
@cra1g I wonder if the relabeling occurred with the other image. For me, the equity message is so strong - the other message seems relatively simplistic and communicates a kind of self-congratulatory "us-vs-them" message.
@parallelarts Well, I originally made the meme to explain my position to one other person, with whom I was having a political discussion/debate, and I never really expected it to go beyond that. At the time, my awareness of the definition of "equity" was rooted in equity theory, which doesn't concern itself with needs, only merit.
@cra1g I understand. Thanks for clarification. I actually did not pick up on the fact that you were the creator of this graphic.
@cra1g @parallelarts
What would your thoughts be on replacing the word with “fairness”?
@mcareaveyjb @parallelarts "Fairness," at least in American English, is a vague umbrella term that doesn't offer sufficient precision to be used in a prescriptive way like this requires. I'm now OK with "equity" being used for the right-hand side, but that required me going back to some of the earliest writings on organizational justice to see how to reconcile it with the merit-based use of that word. The secret is realizing that equity is distributive justice based on *proportionality*.

@cra1g @parallelarts I'm not familiar with "equity" being associated with needs or contribution, but in a strictly economic sense it can be interpreted as being evenly distributed by value.

It's obvious that the tallest spectator has little to lose by offering a position to the shortest, and it would ultimately result in a uniform distribution of value.

Maybe the short guy is a jerk who doesn't deserve to see the game and bullies the tall guy into it, who knows. It could still be "unfair".

@empire Equity theory dates back to the late 1950s/early 1960s and was driven by the realization that people expect some sort of proportionality regarding their pay and their effort. That concept - proportionality - then was extended to attributes other than effort/contribution to expertise, seniority, need, etc. Equity investments return shares of the profits proportional to how much $ folks contributed, so it's the same idea.

@cra1g @empire I have always had a bit of confusion over the difference between equality and equity. Found this definition:

EQUITY
The term “equity” refers to fairness and justice and is distinguished from equality: Whereas equality means providing the same to all, equity means recognizing that we do not all start from the same place and must acknowledge and make adjustments to imbalances.

Thanks for sharing, it’s very kind of you to share it so freely 😁

@SisAve Thanks for sharing that, but I have to say that definition doesn't match up well with the vast majority of the scholarly or historical writing on the subject. Where did you find it?

@cra1g
naceweb.org

Lol, I googled 😬 it was like the third or fourth hit down 🤷‍♀️

@cra1g It seems to me, the way people use the word this is what they seem to be implying to me. Unless I’m totally missing the mark.
@SisAve People use the word in all sorts of ways, many of which contradict each other. Equality is indeed a dimension of "fairness" and equity is another one. Equity is NOT fairness all by itself, so using the two words synonymously is incorrect.
@cra1g Oh. Ok, thanks for helping clarify that!
@cra1g @parallelarts Thank you for the artwork! Is the relabeling of the image ok with you? It made the concept of 'proportional to one's needs' so clear for me. I so appreciate the visual representation. It's powerful even without labels.
@seeme @parallelarts I'm 100% ok with folks doing whatever they like with/to the image...as long as it helps us have this conversation, it's a plus.

@cra1g @seeme @parallelarts

In the background, we see a stadium, built to form a 'slope' so that all can see.

@cra1g @parallelarts I've seen posters of the Equality/Equity version (with the redrawn people) in our elementary schools here.

Thanks for sharing your story. I had no idea of the background.

@peterbutler That is so awesome to hear, Peter...thanks for the happy news. :-) Kids seem to grok this concept way easier than some adults do.