Yup. Most of Black Twitter used QRTs differently.
A lot of non-Black Twitter only saw it where accounts with millions of followers would pick on a small account to get their followers to dogpile.
Most of Black Twitter used it exactly as you described... The online equivalent of Black folk talking *to each other* about some nonsense that someone in a position of power said.
The problem here is that the non-Black folks don't believe the other use cases.
No, it's also disbelief that there are positive uses, as I said.
Here's one example (from my now abandoned mastodon.cloud account, RIP!).
Geoff starts out saying I'm disingenuous, then that this can't be how Black people use the feature because he's never seen it used that way, despite the fact that he doesn't interact with many (any?) Black users on Twitter.
https://mastodon.cloud/@mekkaokereke/109359366766816080
Please, don't use this to bother him. Let him be!
@[email protected] @[email protected] Short version: On Twitter, Black folk often talk to each other *about* what powerful but clueless white folk in power say. QTs make that easy to do. Unfortunately, QTs are also used to enable unpleasant conversation. Throughout US history, white folk have prioritized pleasant conversation over enabling social change. This is the point of MLK's least famous words π: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=gfFWzacEgAI Mastodon is no different.
I don't keep these examples so the people in them can be bothered.
I keep them because I know that lots of white folk don't believe Black folk, so if I say
"people don't believe how Black folk used quote tweets"
or "Someone blocked me because they said that by warning other Black users that I moved servers because of too many nazi death threats, I was 'bashing' the server"
or "people think it's not a big deal if many new Black users are 1st exposed to Nazi threats"
people don't believe me.