Good morning! A post just rolled across my fedi-timeline saying not to post about politics on Mastodon, so I'm here to remind you that:

1 "politics" refers to decision-making about how to live together in groups
2 choosing to not participate in political discussion is saying you support the status quo, and is a political stance
3 abstaining from politics because you feel safe from its impacts is a privilege and a choice to abandon your more vulnerable neighbours

@inkstainedmags perhaps a good compromise is to use CW for all political posts?
@JonChevreau I know there is a lot of talk about how to use CW over here. I'm new and trying to listen and learn but my opinion is that CWs should be used sparingly and those who want to avoid certain subjects should use mute liberally.
@inkstainedmags @JonChevreau cw’s should be used liberally for the sake of being polite. If you label it as being political then people who are interested will tap. I know sometimes I’d like a political free day, it’s nice not to have it in my face while scrolling the fedi. Look you’re coming into someone else’s house so the polite thing to do is be considerate & abide by the local customs.

@Jofish5000 @inkstainedmags @JonChevreau

I disagree, and the analogy doesn't work. Politics are both unavoidable, and the action of burying one's head should be active on the part of the one who wants to be buried. People should not have to tiptoe around issues that impact their daily lives for the sake of someone else's *being tired of thinking about it*. This is not a trauma trigger we're talking about.

If you don't want to read something someone has to say, you can just... Not. Most political topics are obvious at the skim of a few lines, the mute option is *right there*, and so is your ability to scroll.

Moreover, the Fediverse is not someone else's home that new folks are just inviting themselves into. These are servers set up specifically for public access and participation. If the point was actually to have spaces with limited topics of discussion of mutual interest, or where strict social protocols existed when discussing anything more complex than pablum, then a) the software wouldn't be open source, and b) the network would be opt in, not opt out.

You can have your politics free enclave, if you want. Just spin up your own instance, and work with a whitelist.

Moreover, your *home timeline* is not your home. It's your own personal list of content from speakers who you have curated. If you don't like what some of them are saying, just remove them from your list, and further curate which topics or keywords you want to mask.

You have that power. The responsibility is yours.

@Kichae @Jofish5000 @inkstainedmags @JonChevreau no politics? what would be the point?
@barrygoldman1 @Kichae @inkstainedmags @JonChevreau I understand that this thread has become quite long, but I have stated that I am all for politics. It was then a question of covering politics with a content warning and a title of what it is. That I am in favor for, it just seems more polite. People seem to use cw pretty liberally on Mastodon out of consideration of others.
@Jofish5000 @Kichae @inkstainedmags @JonChevreau is mastodon a public space? i EXPECT to be disturbed when i go out in the world. i don't expect it on a regular basis, that would require some regulation, but... real life... is rough.
@barrygoldman1 @Kichae @inkstainedmags @JonChevreau as far as I’ve been reading on the fedi, Mastodon should be polite and that’s why people are loving it. Think of the cw as a small “regulation” on staying polite and considerate of others. I think it feels like a breath of fresh air. The term “doom scrolling” was coined for a reason. My opinion is that people are tired of doom scrolling, I know I am.