- Seriously mindblowing 0 days no one even considered that shock and amaze you with the hackers thinking
- Developers that took shortcuts to meet some kind of deadline
@insiderphd Found it!
How we did successful shifting left at scale, by ignoring all the standard advice and methodologies
Featuring ....
- Me presenting somebody else's slides after only seeing the talk once, the day before, on the train.
- Me waking everyone up my punching the mic with my flappy hands at an unexpected point.
- Far too many Top Gear references (see "Not My Slides")
I have a 100% effective security measure, but I can't share it because it would no longer be 100% effective.
@Pjcoyle @insiderphd
😂 Good one Patrick! Was a little skeptical but was secretly hoping you did have some sort of an innovative solution.
Seriously though, it does not have to be this extreme--nor this perfect of a security. Products with security designed in will make big enough of a difference in the longer term. Deliberate detail to security during design and development is the way. However, we are back to my original question: What would make product manufacturers and software suppliers to take this on?
As a developer...
That second category is our fault in many cases.
Communication is one thing, and informing project stakeholders of the severity of their decisions is something we might not be able to perform... (And yes, that's not all our fault. To say it is, is to take a victim blaming attitude.)
But...
Well, there's Therac-25.
I've heard people say that software can't harm hardware.
Nah, software can kill. And if given the opportunity, it can kill easily and quickly. (As well as slowly and painfully, as in the case of acute radiation poisoning.)
We need to be held to a higher standard (and empowered to enforce that standard.).
"Research has shown the ratio of shortcut to mindblowing is 487:1."