I want to be happy here.

But my Black friends keep getting banned for doing justice work.

Or just... Existing.

At a much quieter volume than I do.

If people didn’t know me or who I’m connected to, would I be gone by now too? 😔

How do you exist in a world where your cultural norm is frowned upon?

Why do I always have to compromise with the oppression dynamic

or get removed? 😭

It’s painful.

And there’s no reason to it.

And all the “solutions” include bowing to that same dynamic.

Leaving isn’t your defeat.

It’s to the shame of the space that refuses to recognize they have blocked your equity.

But it still building the road that leads back to the opening of fascism.

That should worry people. Because again it’s not just the red hats and the cross burners.

It’s liberal spaces that cannot bear critique & disguise the rejection as rule breaking, thus the fault of the justice worker.

Staying isn’t a victory.

Because you’re not free.

You’re perpetuating the illusion of freedom, in the hopes that your presence and conduct as a leader shields others.

Which partially works - not well enough apparently - and also plays into respectability politics - oppression in fancy clothes.

Because again, people whose voices are gentler than mine,

some who agreed to stay behind CW or move to “better” instances?

Still got suspended.

TWO this weekend.

I’m not going to list names. That just sends them more abuse.

I’ve been doing this work 30 years. I know when I’m being put on a merry-go-round.

So just please remember all parties need a certain amount of privilege for name & shame to work.

The fact that it happened means I don't have enough to cover them.

If they have enough they'd still be here.

The most frustrating thing is going to be

when the voices that have been silenced in this space

are needed inALL spaces to rescue us from fascism

yet again.

They will appear when called and do their duty.

Because THEY know what most don’t.

We need them.
Because they serve The World, not just other Black women.

Securing our rights secures everyone higher in the caste or intersected.

We need the voices from the Black community that are also the most shunned.

The world treats us so horribly but also can’t exist without us.

And by the time it is realized in the macro, it is ALWAYS too late in the micro.

Notes: I don't know why an image that only says #BlackLivesMatters is marked as sensitive media when hashtags like #/BlackLivesStillDontMatter are not.

Also I only marked the rest of the thread with CW so I would not be overwhelming the stream.

#BlackMastodon I see you. I am just thinking and exhausted.

Sigh. I should not have to point out that some #BlackMastodon friends have been booted for EXISTING.

Or to point out AGAIN that *moving to another instance as Black people in circumstances where white people don’t IS ALSO AN OPPRESSION DYNAMIC.

You don’t have to listen. You don’t have to care.

I am not addressing even you - why would I discussing drowning with WATER??

https://mastodon.social/@Tinu/109321899146294406

An update: admin of this server contacted me. It led to a positive place.

Prior to that convo, one of my three peers has been reinstated.

Regarding the sensitive marking of that photo- the reason I said I don’t know was not to be sarcastic. I truly don’t know what happened , including if I did it by accident .

What concerns me is whenI edited to un-do it? I cannot get to the greyed out option to change it.

@Tinu I'm sorry you and other POC have been having to deal with this shit. Many of us are paying attention and appreciate your voices
@monsteratmydesk I am surprised at how many replies of affirmation I get here. Thank you.

@Tinu I too am sorry that you and other POC are going through this.

I am well aware that my journey as an #AntiRacist #Ally is a bumpy and forever ongoing journey. Virtual redlining SO obviously isn't the answer. And you shouldn't need to speak up about any of this.

I respect and appreciate you and others who lift your voices. I hope that you find far more here who listen, affirm, and amplify than those who attack & denigrate.

@Tinu

Images in a CW post are automatically marked as sensitive content by the software. That post doesn't have a CW, though, so.... yeah.

@haven4books @Tinu I tend to suspect a bug in how images in CW threads are handled. AFAICT, Mastodon's code isn't smart enough to mark an image as sensitive based on content, even if they wanted to.
@pandion @haven4books I don’t know. Maybe. No for now I’m just saying I don’t know.

@haven4books I figured it was automatic. But I don’t know WHY that set it off when it hasn’t before.

Or who programmed it that way. Or why no one fixed it.

So when I don’t know the reason? But can speculate? I say I don’t know. Maybe that’s annoying but it’s an integrity thing with me. 🤷🏾‍♀️

@Tinu @haven4books Perhaps it’s because it’s a reply to a post with a CW?

I’m still learning the subtleties of how things work here, but I’m fairly sure there isn’t any of the algorithmic ranking/tagging that we’re used to on social networks.

@Tinu @haven4books The upside to Mastodon is that the code is publicly available, unlike the closed systems of proprietary platforms. It’s not your responsibility to check for problems, but as a developer I could, and I’m sure many others already are - I’d expect anything problematic at the software level to be called out pretty quickly.
@Tinu @haven4books Federated instances are great, but any response (no matter whether intentions were good or not) to your concerns that goes along the lines of “you can set up your own server!” is absolutely the wrong take in this case, when we’re discussing the policies of what’s probably going to be the “default” community.
@Tinu @haven4books In those cases, what (I hope) was meant to raise awareness of the benefits offered by this platform can easily & understandably sound like “find your own space” from a different perspective. It comes across as horrible, harsh, and exclusionary… I assume most of the people who replied that way would agree after giving it more thought.
@Tinu @haven4books I’m only aware of two cases that were concerning, both of which have been resolved l. I’m not asking for other examples (it isn’t your job, I’ll do my own research 😜) but I really, really hope that these are mistakes caused by a mixture of unfamiliar software, moderators lacking a full understanding & appreciation of the issues, and this abnormally chaotic incident of a Twitter exodus increasing the workload & broadening the diversity of users.
@Tinu @haven4books The best analogy I’ve seen from someone who’s been using Mastodon for a while was “imagine you’re lying in a field with a few friends & just chatting to each other, and then a music festival suddenly turns up” - not meant in a bad way, just to acknowledge the adjustment period hehe.
@Tinu @haven4books Concerns and suspicions are totally justifiable when entering a new environment, and the fact that this looks & feels very much like Twitter (despite significant differences under the hood) makes it easy to jump to conclusions, particularly with the current vibe at the last place, but *for the time being* I’m giving them the benefit of doubt & not assuming malicious intent just yet.

@Tinu @haven4books The potential problem has been raised & gained traction online.

No, there shouldn’t be a separate server.

No, it’s not up to others to educate the moderators further after pointing out an error in their judgement.

They’re aware of the situation & I’m very interested to see how things progress - I hope that with a wider understanding of its communities, this platform will live up to the standards it claims to have.

@jcc @haven4books an excellent summation. I only 89% agree but have to admit to its quality.
@Tinu @haven4books Thank you for the response 😊 I’ll take the 89% haha, I’m still learning a lot myself.

@haven4books @jcc I have zero expectations for this to be like Twitter. I did in 2016 when I arrived- like Twitter but an upgrade.

6 years later I don’t expect Anywhere to be like Twitter and have suggested to my audience that it won’t.

That’s the problem really, a particular experience I expected not to experience because “this ain’t Twitter”

IS like Twitter-

worse as at least those people are direct & conscious of their behavior & how it affects me.

@jcc @haven4books Yeah I’ve not only been around since before social started, I’ve started and run communities.

There’s adjustment periods. And then there’s ways communities tell marginalized people not to bother getting comfortable.

The only expectation I had of Mastodon was

not to be treated differently from white people

in a way that involved me doing extra labor my white friends dont, specifically due to race.

@haven4books @Tinu Oh! Please accept my apologies, then - you’re clearly much more familiar with these situations than I am 😅

Re the adjustment periods comment, I hope that’s what it turns out to be… the community needs to educate itself & change its perspective to be genuinely welcoming of marginalised groups.

The appeal of a platform that isn’t controlled by corporate interests is exciting, and I’d hate for it to be yet another thing f*cked up by white people.

@haven4books @jcc I had been sure it was when it was five people.

When dozens have people have the same complaint and there are discussion groups about it? I tend to think it’s a little more serious. I didn’t write this out of pure anger or a whim.

I did it because other people have told me they don’t feel safe speaking up after repeated tries. I’m somewhat protected from simply being ignored.

@haven4books @jcc one hopes. A few have apologized or admitted they misconstrued my query.
@haven4books @Tinu I’m glad to hear that… I still believe in the good of (most) people when they’re able to show more empathy.
@jcc @haven4books Thanks for understanding this nuance which I apparently haven’t been as clear about as I would have liked.

@jcc @haven4books Yeah from my IT troubleshooting days, step 2 is gathering data to see if there actually IS a problem or if you are experiencing a feature as a problem.

Which is why I wondered allowed. I wasn’t being snide or snarky. I literally don’t know.

@Tinu @jcc @haven4books

Likewise, I have set up a server just to poke around and see how everything works. Some of the things we are seeing are not intentional. They are still problematic and need fixed though.

Other things look like they were developed with good intent but are being exploited by bad-actors. The 100% fix for that is to kick out the bad-actors STAT. However, some tweaks could be made to make them harder to abuse.
@haven4books @Tinu Didn’t interpret your post as snide or snarky btw - there’s no expectation for you to know, but it’s great that others can verify because the code is open.

@jcc @Tinu @haven4books Called out, but not necessarily fixed.

Case in point: "Local-only posts", that don't get shared to other instances, are very helpful at reducing abuse for people who are on well-moderated instances (and good from a privacy perspective, too). The glitch fork implemented these in 2017, and the Hometown fork also has them. But Mastodon's BDFL Eugen has rejected them from the mainline code, so they're not available on most sites.

@haven4books @jcc S others have pointed out, perhaps re the image.
@haven4books @Tinu did you reply to the post that had a CW, uploaded an image, THEN turned off the CW? Maybe that left the upload image marked as sensitive content.
@haven4books @Tinu yep i just tested it, if you upload an image while the CW is enabled, the image will automatically get marked as sensitive content. I guess you turned off the CW but forgot to uncheck the checkbox to mark the image as sensitive content.
@lamp @Tinu I just tried it myself and this definitely happens; if you do it in that order, you also need to uncheck sensitive media and the check box honestly has terrible styling so it doesn't really look checked

@Tinu wait, you posted a BLM image and somehow it got tagged as sensitive? What the actual fuck. Even though I'm a server admin, I don't know the internals of mastodon that well and assumed there was no automatic moderation of that type. Maybe another #MastadonAdmin can chime in here?

I have more to say about this whole thing. Part of me wants receipts but not because I need proof. I know everything you've said is true. I just want to rage. Probably best you didn't name names. I'm incensed.

@Tinu Hey @Gargron please don't automatically censor an image that says #BlackLivesMatter. I sincerely hope this is a bug—and will be fixed!
@atomicpoet @Tinu There is no automatic anything, nor did anyone from the mod team touch anything here. Whether media is sensitive is controlled by the post author when composing the post. You can update it by editing the post.
@Gargron @atomicpoet @Tinu I've seen another post today that didn't have a CW but apparently CW on the pic. By a new poster, different context. Maybe there is a bug? Or some issue with UI somewhere that is messing things up for people?
@chickamora @atomicpoet @Tinu A content warning is a separate thing from marking media as sensitive, though a content warning automatically sets media as sensitive it can be done separately. A content warning is only for hiding the text.

@Gargron @chickamora @atomicpoet @Tinu

Its a bug with mastodon - if you reply to a post marked with a "content warning" then remove the text, but don't click the blue "CW" then type a bunch into the input box then add an image; the usual "Mark media as sensitive" checkbox is hidden below the input text and the scroll bar only scrolls to show the image. This means your only indication it will be marked sensitive is the easy-to-miss blue "CW".

@chickamora @Gargron @atomicpoet @Tinu
You can add a nsfw warning to media without having a cw in your post
@Tinu I may be wrong, but I think if the post has CWs the image is automatically marked sensitive. I'm no expert though, still learning this platform myself.
@Tinu I think I figured out what happened here as I just ran a quick test.
When you respond to a post with a CW it automatically enables a CW on your response. It looks like you undid that by hitting CW but even doing that if you upload an image it defaults to having the flag for sensitive media enabled.
@Tinu So, if you are responding to a post that has a CW and you don’t want your response to be masked you need to make sure you hit CW to remove the CW from your post and tick the mark as sensitive media slider after uploading your image.
@Tinu My best guess is that you accidentally checked the "mark media as sensitive" checkbox; try editing your toot and see if it is checked (if so, just uncheck it and save) 😄