Thanks for the wonderful post. The problem with your approach, for me at least, is that it takes endless patience, and it’s somewhat analogous to speaking with a plant. I applaud your perseverance, which is beyond my capacity. I merely put on my noise canceling headphones and tune then out.
I’m going to disagree with you.
It requires just a little more patience than the target.
The tactic is a bet that you know the tactically gross subject more deeply than the target knows their subject, which in this case is winning with house money since Dr Tillman actually has a knowledge base and the rube pushing the bullshit only knows either duckspeak responses if they’re a follower and only bullshit if they’re a leader.
I understand the basis of your disagreement. I was speaking only on the basis of limited personal experience as a (former) academic and as someone who gets simply exhausted speaking to those who reject anything resembling empirical evidence. I applaud those who still believe it’s possible to have such dialogues. I’ve simply given up.
I’m just a hacker, though I attempt to maintain and expand a wide, not quite deep enough pool of knowledge. Personally I prefer a different approach, though, IRL.
If I approach with the attitude that I want to communicate, I have a puzzle in front of me to play with.
The puzzle is how to get through the thought stopping tripwires he’s allowed to surround his mind.
Success means they realize for at least a moment they don’t recognize who they are at the moment.