A lot of Mastodon advice I’m seeing seems to be geared toward “How to replicate your Twitter experience” or “Can Mastodon replicate your Twitter experience?”

But… I don’t WANT to replicate my Twitter experience. 1/more

My Twitter experience was kinda bad for me! It was good for a long time, but it was also bad. I’m not talking about the takeover by Captain 420, or people tweeting mean things at me. I mean the constantly feeling like a exposed nerve. The “let me show you this awesome new thing to be mad about!”

I love, for instance, that Mastodon doesn’t have the equivalent of a QT. There are plenty other platforms to do the “Hey, look at this asshole here” thing. The, “Does this smell bad to you?” thing. /2

And I’m happy with having fewer followers. No offense to my Twitter followers! But if you were around long enough and built enough numbers, you had a lot of followers who really shouldn’t be following you. People who followed you for, like, one snarky tweet you wrote in 2015, and then you spent the next seven years disappointing them by doing something else. /3

I get that people might miss Twitter’s influence. But that obviously had costs too. One of those was convincing so many people that they were every day engaged in a giant tug of war over The Discourse, and that every tweet of theirs—and everyone in their feed—should be aimed at moving that rope three millimeters in the correct direction.

I don’t deny social media’s power to make change. But I’m one culture critic spouting opinions. I am not organizing the friggin Arab Spring over here. /4

Anyway, I don’t know if I’m going to use this site much. I’m trying to unplug more generally. (Also: I’m still on Twitter, just using it less.) Maybe this is just methadone for Twitter. Methadon.

But I would love this to be a smaller, more positive, less brain-poisoning experience. And that may not be possible! Maybe many of the problems I had with Twitter were in fact Me Problems, and I packed them in my luggage with me. Let’s find out! /end

@poniewozik

I'm just stumbling across this thread now, but I agree

For me, the thing I like is that it has far less of the massive-group-flocking-attention thing you see on Twitter

I'd rather just have conversations with interesting randos, to whom I am a hopefully interesting rando

I don't feel the slightest need to know what microzeitgeist is being hallucinated into existence by the sudden joint attention of 100 million people

@poniewozik

(I am being a bit hyperbolic here I realize ...

It's not that I don't have "the slightest interest" -- I'm as intrigued as the next person by what big joint-attention public conversations are going on ...

It's just that Twitter's design led to a constant *waterfall* of 'em ... too much to find pleasant in any way)