@TinyExplosions @seldo For my own case, I find that my primary means of discovery is seeing people engage in replies to others (or me, but mostly others), in ways I want to see more of. That prompts me to look at their profile, and possibly follow if I like what I see.
That applies to both Twitter and here... the signal-to-noise ratio for algorithmically-surfaced or server / federated feeds isn't great in terms of "will this point out people I want to follow."
@TinyExplosions @seldo It shouldn't lead to an echo chamber unless your initial few people you choose to follow are all very similar and don't have any diversity among those who engage in their threads.
Otherwise, IMO that methodology should (and in my experience does) trend *away* from echo-chamber-ness, unless you deliberately cultivate one. All it takes is one interesting reply to lead to an interesting account with lots more interesting discussion, etc. etc.
@TinyExplosions @seldo Not in my experience. I've ended up w/ a pretty diverse list of people I follow, w/ all kinds of political leanings. Take a look at who I follow on Twitter if you're curious; that's a *long* way from being an EC.
Why do you think an EC is inevitable? I can't see how that could happen unless you only select similar people to follow. Choosing to follow interesting views you disagree w/ or lean differently to is just as easy as picking ones which align w/ your own views.
@TinyExplosions Maybe we just tick differently? I don't see "following friends" as the goal - I follow plenty of people I suspect I'd find it quite difficult to be friends with!
My primary goal when selecting follows is to surface views that make me think, make me question my own beliefs, etc. I like to be challenged, to learn things, to have to justify my own position (or change my mind if shown to be wrong), and see things from angles I may not have considered before.