Many government agencies are expressing concerns about how to communicate with the public without Twitter, especially in emergencies. Of course, it was a bad idea to become dependent on Twitter to such an extent in the first place, and no matter what happens, this needs rethinking.
@lauren Mastodon provides a nice clear choice.
@mgifford @lauren yeah, but which instance do they join? It feels...not right to me for them to join .social domains. Maybe some will set up their own instances, which could be...interesting.
@trekman10 @mgifford @lauren at least social.bund.de, social.networks.Europa.eu are already there :)
@MattiSG @mgifford @lauren I could totally imagine even universities using this. Idk about you but when I was in uni they tried like 2 or 3 times to get the student body and staff to use proprietary or walled off websites for social media like communication within the school. An instance run by a uni comms department or student group could be really cool. Or just a hellhole depending on how it's moderated.
@MattiSG @mgifford @trekman10 @lauren Nothing odd about this at all. This is how kids use to join Usenet. From their university or department Usenet server. Universities or departments could run their own Mastodon server.
@trekman10 @MattiSG @lauren but it could be moderated to fit the needs of that particular community.
@mgifford @MattiSG @lauren I'm just saying. Some bureaucrats would be cut out for moderation roles. Others would be like power tripping fb mods.
@MattiSG @trekman10 @lauren that is a huge advantage for employees if forward thinking governments.
@trekman10 @lauren It doesn't much matter where they begin. It is always possible to move. By design this problem has been resolved. So start where it is easy.
@mgifford @trekman10 AFAIK it's fairly easy to move followers, but not following. Yes, government agencies would typically have many more of the former than the latter. But also as government agencies, they cannot just plop down on any server without due consideration of its operational and policy characteristics, even briefly.

@lauren @trekman10 The institutions yes. But hopefully they eventually just settle on a government domain name and manage control of it that way.

Lots of stuff was just easier when there was a benevolent dictator taking care of things (even imperfectly).

@trekman10 @mgifford @lauren Maybe public goberment instantes by continent...with individual accounts for each country? Not sure if this makes sense, just thinking out loud.
@bunsibunbuns @trekman10 @lauren could be but suspect per department or agency will be more normal. We will have to see.
@trekman10 @mgifford @lauren As I understand it, the german government has its own domain. I think it's social.bund.de

@mgifford @lauren

"Mastodon provides a nice clear choice."

No

@mgifford @lauren it really doesn’t, though. Lots of people have expressed confusion over how to even make an account or join a server, and many local govt agencies don’t adopt new tech that quickly (I’m speaking from experience)

@allirico @mgifford @lauren government agencies shouldn't assume private Internet or telecommunications networks are available/reliable in emergencies (much is heavily dependent on mains electricity and due to commercial pressures can be quickly overloaded).

If they must deploy online resources they should own them themselves, and work alongside linear radio and TV broadcasters (particularly public service broadcasters where present)

@vfrmedia @allirico @lauren I like the idea of municipal owned networks. Having redundancy is good when disasters strike.

@allirico @lauren gov was confused by social media back in the day too. Leaders figured it out. Others followed. It became expected.

Same will happen if Twitter collapses & it is replaced by something else.

@mgifford @allirico We can hope so, though the political environment is considerably more toxic now.