I have a request.

Bad actors will soon figure out - if they haven't already - that setting up impersonations of important organizations now will allow them to set off an explosion of chaos and confusion at a time of their choosing.

So if you run an account for an organization (especially #LGBTQ), please set up link verification between your Mastodon account profile and your organization's website.

If not, please boost.

Instructions are here under "Link Verification":
https://docs.joinmastodon.org/user/profile/

Setting up your profile - Mastodon documentation

Get started with your new account.

@theruss I'd even say that self-hosting their account is for them the best checkmark. If Company owns company.com, then I'd trust [email protected] more than [email protected].
@KekunPlazas That strikes me as an ideal way forward from the perspective of verification, but I worry that having every company that runs a social media presence -- given most companies are small -- having to *also* maintain a Mastodon instance might start to become a lot of overhead.
@OpaqueLightbulb Good point! I run two accounts for a small group of volunteers. Will ask the techies to verify my account via link asap. Alas there are trolls in my field, too.
@OpaqueLightbulb
But they don't have to run the Mastodon instance by themselves! I have my own instance hosted at httos://ossrox.org for 5€ (5 users max, larger ones don't cost much more) and I only had to point the domainname owned by me at one of their servers. 🤷‍♂️
@KekunPlazas
@roland And they manage the instance, do updates, backup, and be on top of security?
@danieldekay
Yes, all the technical stuff. User admin and moderation is up to the customer.

@roland @danieldekay
But honestly how much moderation do your own accounts need?
PR blasts out some stuff, everyone is employed/in your project.

furthermore [email protected] feels very much like brand@gmail/yahoo/aol
All the red flags instantly go off. (like the vw accounts)

And ofc there are good other self hosted plugins/solutions.

@mwfc @roland Fully agree that moderation on a small instance with controlled users like from within a company should be a no- issue. I guess the only work would be Incoming stuff.

@danieldekay @roland

But why would you moderate that? you ignore stupid requests. Done. Should not be more interaction. Or am I missing something?

@roland @mwfc probably not. Thanks for the heads up.

@danieldekay @roland

Basicly I was thinking in the lines of setting up a institution server, so I was really wondering. And given the availibility of Friendica et al I see no reason why you should not host your own instance as a brand/institute. It should be really low effort, and no need to worry about ToS and other stuff on a foreign instance + brand recognition

This is more for commercial entities tho, I find VW odd to supposedly run to mastodon.social if true

https://europe.autonews.com/automakers/vw-joins-mastodon-concerns-over-twitter-mount

VW joins Mastodon as concerns over Twitter mount

VW is among a number of major car brands that have paused advertising on Twitter following Elon Musk's buyout of the platform.

Automotive News Europe
@roland @OpaqueLightbulb @KekunPlazas Maybe the solution for the future of the web business card? @antzee - here’s your personalized Mastodon server hassle free, see 👆🏼

Even self-hosted organizations should use link verification from their website.

@matrix @KekunPlazas @theruss

@KekunPlazas @voxpelli Yeah, @TexasObserver did this, and I think it's great.

There are three reasons I didn't issue this as a blanket recommendation, though:
1) It does involve both some effort and money on an ongoing basis; it's not fire-and-forget.
2) There's also a non-zero chance of an incorrectly-configured or undermaintained instance getting pwned.
3) Some folks use the same account for personal and work stuff, and I don't want my boss to be able to lock me out of my account.

@theruss @KekunPlazas @TexasObserver Yeah, I’m thinking I want to be at voxpelli(at)voxpelli.com eventually or eg me(at) or simply just voxpelli.com
I do professional and personal stuff from the same account, for sure wouldn’t want to have a different professional account that represents me
@theruss @KekunPlazas @voxpelli @TexasObserver I am afraid TO hasn't done the rel="me" bit yet.

@steelman @KekunPlazas @voxpelli @TexasObserver

It's not necessarily obvious, but having an instance running on the TexasObserver.com domain is substantially stronger evidence than a verified link from the website.

That said, it wouldn't hurt!

@theruss @KekunPlazas @voxpelli @TexasObserver Of course! I didn't notice they've got their own domain and I was looking at the links. OTOH they haven't used their well known domain, instead they've bought a new one and without the rel="me" bit the connection between the domains isn't clear (even whois data are redacted). Their solution will help them avoiding instance wide bans, but it does little with regards to verification.
@steelman @theruss @KekunPlazas @voxpelli We will be adding the rel="me" linkage as soon as possible.
@TexasObserver @KekunPlazas @theruss @steelman be sure to only add it between URL:s that represents the same identity as you, so eg. don’t add it to the footer of all pages, else identity crawlers like my old experiment will have a really tough time: https://voxpelli.com/2012/10/relspider-what-why/
RelSpider - what and why? – Pelle Wessman