On the "quote tweet" debate:

QT is one of several decisions that made Twitter into a place where powerful or 'influential' people post, and most of the other posts are reactions to that material – agreement, dunks, critiques, jokes, etc.

Even if people didn't always use it for that themselves, it was part of creating the overall feeling that there is one big topic under discussion at any given time – and so of course you add your opinion on that topic.

Not having QT also encourages replies!

@tomw

* Without QT, I can't explain why people should read the reboosted thread

* Without QT, I can't help others decide whether they *want* to actually read it.

* Without QT, I can't give people the chance to read a short summary instead of the full thread

* QT is personal. Reboost is impersonal.

* I'd argue that reboost does MORE to concentrate focus on individuals and specific posts than QT. More focus on strangers' views than your friends' views.