Many commentators are tweeting & tooting that we need to expand the SCOTUS. That is not the answer to everything. Unless you just want a larger Court, not bound by ethics rules, engaging in the kind of behavior described in the NYT piece. What we need are guardrails - an understanding that the Court sits w/i our democracy. Our job us to strengthen it by creating the processes that promote impartiality & insulation from lobbying, not crossing our fingers & hoping for the best.
@ifilljustice we need both. Not one OR a the other. As long as there are no term limits, we are stuck with a SCOTUS in which 3 judges aren’t even legitimate. Democrats need to expand SCOTUS, all judges must have term limits, and an enforceable code of ethics must be put in place.
@mona @ifilljustice Eapecially important is code of ethics. Even a “nasty” president can EVENTUALLY be removed by vote…but a BAD Supreme Court Judge is virtually untouchable.
@ifilljustice @glweiss03 we have seen how “”effective” the removal of a blatantly criminal potus is. A judge can be impeached but it’s as tall an order as the impeachment of a potus. The problem is that judge appointments are political from beginning till end. We need a code of ethics and term limits. And expansion of the court. And with all of this we still cannot guarantee an impartial scotus if judgeships are being bought and paid for by dark money
@mona @ifilljustice @glweiss03 I'd be very weary of proposing term limits as a panacea for anything. Primary issue being that it decreases accountability (making radical decisions that you dont have to see through) and leads to a "revolving door" culture which has been shown to increase the strength of lobbyists.
Stronger accountability for those that do serve would be better. Let them keep their long tenures, but make it so that they can be more easily replaced.