This piece on Wired about Black Twitter is worth your time. It's something I've been thinking about a lot, about how uneven a migration to a new space ends up being.

It also is one thing I'm eyeing about Mastodon. There's a danger that servers become silos if we aren't intentional. If you listen to some of the Black scholars in my field, they are saying as much. Twitter makes their work visible across groups.

So how do we federate for inclusion? It will be a challenge.

https://www.wired.com/story/black-twitter-elon-musk/

There Is No Replacement for Black Twitter

A series of missteps by Elon Musk has called the fate of the platform’s cultural engine into question.

WIRED

@JeremyLittau Admins deciding what is "safe" for their users (which is very unsafe, by the way) is what creates silos. If a site's admins habitually defederate sites they don't like, then a silo is the result, by definition.

weirder.earth is an example of a Mastodon site that turned into a silo. They block so many peers, some of their users now can't connect to most of their friends.

This is why I believe blocking should be done at the user level only, with the help of opt-in blocklists.

@mcdutchie @JeremyLittau you need an admin/instance you can trust. That is for sure. But you need to trust Twitter or Facebook or any other social media plattform host as well. Imho this is a non-discussion. More important is: how do we build instances that we can trust? The good thing about Masto is that different instances are trying different models at the moment. Just look at social.coop, vivaldi.social or digitalcourage.social for example. Are they turstworthy?