Leah LitmanNov 19, 2022

🚨🚨🚨🚨

RT @[email protected]

NEW: A former anti-abortion leader says that the recent Supreme Court leak was *not* the only recent breach.

He obtained word of the 2014 Hobby Lobby ruling after years of using faith & favors to gain access to the Court, he says.

By me & Jo Becker http://bit.ly/3OijUUJ

🐦🔗: https://twitter.com/jodikantor/status/1593945158634070017

Former Anti-Abortion Leader Alleges Another Supreme Court Breach

Years before the leaked draft opinion overturning Roe v. Wade, a landmark contraception ruling was disclosed, according to a minister who led a secretive effort to influence justices.

The New York Times
Show threadLeah Litman
b a n a n a s https://twitter.com/andrew_chung_/status/1593944630999097346
Andrew Chung on Twitter

“ANOTHER LEAK? Evangelical leader claims he was told the outcome of a major Supreme Court decision in 2014 limiting access to contraception before it was issued. Like the leaked Dobbs decision, it was authored by Justice Alito. Via @nytimes https://t.co/bbIWyFK6ZB”

Twitter
Nov 19, 2022 at 1:03pmMastodon Twitter Crossposter
Show threadLeah LitmanNov 19, 2022
does this … cross an important line? 🤔🤔🤔
Show threadLeah LitmanNov 19, 2022
But seriously … wtf????? I can’t believe I just read this???????
Show threadT.WllmsNov 19, 2022

@LeahLitman

There is no honor in conservatives of Alito’s ilk they are every-bit as lying and deceitful as we assume.. and have proven to be. I absolutely believe it. I wouldn’t be surprised if it was Alito himself or Thomas who leaked the Dobbs decision … JMO … for whatever that’s worth..

Show threadJeff konradNov 19, 2022

@tdwllms1 @LeahLitman

Alito wrote it, and had an interest in locking in others' votes, so it makes sense that Alito leaked it.

Show threadEric VeyNov 19, 2022

@LeahLitman

Why not? All the rules are being broken and all the imaginary guardrails are gone. Burning it all down to own the libs.

Show threadJayne 📚☘️🐾💃🏻🎶🌊🇺🇸🇺🇦🌻Nov 19, 2022
@vey981 @LeahLitman it’s a shame SCOTUS that is not longer credible.
Show threadRyan Egesdahl Nov 19, 2022
@LeahLitman I’ve said it before, and I’ll keep saying it forever: if the Court is interested in maintaining its political independence and its perception of being above the political fray, they probably should not do things with such obvious political motives.
Show threadDRE The LawyerNov 19, 2022
@LeahLitman
Show threadDidiQNov 19, 2022
@LeahLitman yes but the SC can be as corrupt as it wants, nobody holds them accountable.
Show threadLinus Banghart-LinnNov 19, 2022

@LeahLitman If by “cross an important line” you mean will it carry any consequences for anyone involved, then no, obviously not.

(Should it? Yes.)

Show threadSteven BodzinNov 19, 2022
@LeahLitman he did it.