JOURNALISM 101 RULE: If someone says it’s raining, and another person says it’s dry, it’s not your job to quote them both. Your job is to look out of the fucking window and find out which is true. — Now more than ever.

@Strandjunker I'd call this an over-simplification, in the "not even wrong" vein.

'Journalism' covers a lot of duties, one of which is reporting pretty much anything that any public figure says, no matter how asinine. The fact they said it is news all by itself, independent of truth or decency. The public have a right to know what leaders say, however stupid.

New ANALYSIS is related, but separate. This seems to be what's being addressed here, but not all news is analysis.

@wesdym @Strandjunker I actually don’t agree with that at all. All journalism has an inherent duty to be bound by ethics and sensability. Just saying someone said a thing isn’t journalism at all it is at best stenography.

@noeyesmcgee @Strandjunker Your remark is abstract, bordering on vague, but what is your concrete proposal? That reporters should not report what an important person says until and unless they can verify the veracity of its substance? Should they not report what they believe are false statements. Should media pick and choose what the public get to know a public figure said?

I know you're sincere, but I feel you haven't fully though this through. There's a reason we have journalism schools.