@yuvipanda I see this as a corollary of the Elizabeth Eisenstein principle[1]: One of the most effective ways to change the behaviour of a system is to change how information flow through it.
How fast/slow, what's promoted/demoted, what's encouraged/discouraged, what's amplified/repressed, what's collected/discarded.
@yuvipanda Tech like Social Media makes social problems appear first of all.
Shut it down, and mightier will decide upon the relevance of your kind.
Second, a host of a platform of any kind will always be one of the mightier. Hence decentralized Mastodon (tech!), obviously.
@yuvipanda Now, if the hammer has a gun attached and it goes off and shoots me in the leg, then yeah, that's horrible user-hostile design (and there is plenty of that in tech).
Tech can't solve all social problems, but it's easy to make the problem a Hell of a lot worse.
@yuvipanda That's a better way to put it. Because technology can create problems, but it can also solve problems.
I immediately thought of how Margaret Sanger and Planned Parenthood addressed a huge number of social problems related to the status of women in society by developing the *technologies* of artificial birth control, liberating women from constant pregnancy.
Most attempts to "solve social problems with technology" are not nearly as radical or clear-headed as Margaret Sanger's promotion of birth control technology, however.
I can think of a few other examples. "Engineering controls" in public health. Making renewables cheaper than fossil fuels.