0

MASTODON’S BREAKFAST CLUB PROBLEM in 10 posts. A Thread.

Here we go:

Mastodon’s UI has issues but it is not the real (or only) risk to adoption right now. It is, instead, what I’m calling the BREAKFAST CLUB problem.

1

Twitter users are look for a lifeboat. They go to sign up with mastodon but the federated model is confusing and the main/original servers are full.

2

Mastodon's onboarding process literally tells users to pick a server "based on their interests". This is like being asked to pick the lunch table you will sit at for the rest of your life.

3

How do you choose a single table to sit at when we’re all the nerd, the jock, the princess, the basket case, and the criminal?

(don't @ me with "you can change servers" I know. The problem is that this is still the first thing you are being asked to do.)

4

Many servers are run by fairly centrist position admins. Some are little hobby farms with high restrictive policies. Both are, in theory, totally fine and compatible with the fediverse.

5

I highly recommend this recent @lawfare podcast where @qjurecic, @arozenshtein, and @klonick dig into the nitty gritty of decentralized social media, mastodon, and how this edge-case server situation could work just fine over time.

https://www.lawfareblog.com/lawfare-podcast-decentralized-social-media-and-great-twitter-exodus

The Lawfare Podcast: Decentralized Social Media and the Great Twitter Exodus

It’s Election Day in the United States—so while you wait for the results to come in, why not listen to a podcast about the other biggest story obsessing the political commentariat right now? We’re talking, of course, about Elon Musk’s purchase of Twitter and the billionaire’s dramatic and erratic changes to the platform. In response to Musk’s takeover, a great number of Twitter users have made the leap to Mastodon, a decentralized platform that offers a very different vision of what social media could look like. What exactly is decentralized social media, and how does it work?

Lawfare

6

But users don’t know this or understand "federated." They are just being told to pick a server. So someone who does a lot of art is like “fine, I’ll reduce my personality to “artist” and choose… mastodon dot art”. Sounds reasonable, right?

Then they hit the rules…

7

In this case a user got banned for posting… Goya’s La maja desnuda… on an art server.

Now, to be fair, the rules for that server are clear! But the problem is that the reasonble expectation is that posting goya on a server branded as “the mastodon art server” should be ok.

8

So the problem is you have these highly restrictive servers that are little fiefdoms.

Some people will be happy in them!

Many will not be!

(pictured: guy who would be very excited to run a little fiefdom less as a service and more as a power trip)

9

Again, this is all by design in the fediverse and in time this all works out.

The problem is that during this period of onboarding new users this will simply drive people away. It’s very high cognitive load for people looking to migrate from Twitter.

10

The solution?

* Mastodon needs to set up a formal governance model like Wikipedia
* Mastodon needs to change the onboarding process to promote generic instances and not subject specific petty fiefdoms (or at least subject specific servers that are relatively broad in their speech policies)

@ethanschoonover The thing is, that by design, there is no centralized governance (for good and bad), so while there are server covenants and such, there's not really a way to vet and handle processes like that. On the one hand, volunteers are making guides and such... on the other hand... it's all run by volunteers.

It's kind of a twitter/discord open source mashup situation, and people used to walled gardens and low-friction/load things are definitely finding it jarring.

@ethanschoonover The values inherent to the design of the mastodon federated system are in conflict with how the birdsite was designed, very purposefully, so while I do think there are major issues to be resolved... the idea of promoting specific instances (which are run by volunteers/hobbyists for the most part) needs to be vetted by... somebody? More volunteers?
@CarolineTheGeek It's why I think they have to look at wikipedia governance as a model. There are ways to do this, but it's a hard problem and now would be the time to tackle it. That lawfare podcast in the thread has a good discussion of some of the issues as well.
@ethanschoonover Yeah, I definitely agree it needs to be tackled, but it's very complicated. Super interesting to think about in terms of the intersections of social media values and cultures on different platforms.

@CarolineTheGeek The lawfare podcast ep I mention does a good job exploring some of those complexities.

I'm all for the weird edge case servers. As it is the fediverse can cope.

My point is just that they shouldn't be the first port of call for newbies who shouldn't need to categorize themselves and sort themselves into a potentially unfun server environment because the mastodon onboarding funneled them there.