A lot of theatre/arts people talk big about community, enabling people and standing up to abuses of power... Then you see those same people defending the very antithesis of that.
Right now the birdsite is a solid example. The refusal to leave or change based on what they've already established as a power structure through their 'following' and 'brand' highlights that really, they want to hold power to account so long as it isn't their own.
And, if I'm being kind... And lord knows I'm really trying... That is because artists and organisations will always see themselves as the underdog, no matter how far they rise.
Large orgs that once started as a one-man band still think of themselves as the plucky upstart, and that blinds them to the institutional biases they've picked up, and the power they yield.
Yet often these same people dominate the discussions around future and support in ways that are quite bullish and harmful.
@adam_y strongly agree with this. I am however seeing those kind of platforms being built on here. When I see accounts with large follower numbers but who follow just a few it feels against the spirit of the place.
Even if I appreciate their content I am compelled not to follow. They usually end up boosted into my timeline anyway.
Adam_Y
BR3N