Steve Vladeck on Twitter

“Federal courts ruled earlier this year that AL, GA, and LA each had to draw an additional “majority-minority” House district to satisfy federal law. In unsigned, unexplained orders, #SCOTUS *blocked* those rulings — resulting in three R seats that would likely have been D seats.”

Twitter

@Gsiskind

Is anyone tracking the national popular vote in House races? I’ll have a go later if not, the data are out there. It is less meaningful than in a presidential election, but I would hesitate to call a House majority illegitimate if that party received the most votes.

@mqs @Gsiskind you can see the national vote totals at Cook. It’s not particularly useful at the moment because California is still counting and a ton of Democratic vote comes out of California. https://www.cookpolitical.com/charts/house-charts/national-house-vote-tracker/2022
2022 National House Vote Tracker

 

Cook Political Report
@mqs @Gsiskind something else to consider when looking at the House popular vote is the fact that there were more congressional districts with no Democratic option than there were without a Republican option. FiveThirtyEight has talked about this a few times over the last couple months. The overall number doesn’t mean as much when people that would like to have voted for a democrat didn’t have one to vote for.
@Hyper_Eye @Gsiskind
Sure. I mean in the end, the aggregate national vote is meaningless, without practical consequence. However, and despite everything, I would have a hard time labeling as illegitimate a party that received more votes. Many things to say about the Republican Party, but people do seem to keep voting for them.