Earlier this week I wrote a post on why Bill C-18 undermines an independent press even as it purports to protect it.
https://www.michaelgeist.ca/2022/11/independence-lost-why-bill-c-18-undermines-an-independent-press-even-as-it-purports-to-protect-it/
Nice to see the publisher of the @[email protected] has similar concerns.
https://twitter.com/globeandmail/status/1591386335096766470
The wording of Bill C-18 needs a rework to protect independent journalism https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-the-wording-of-bill-c-18-needs-a-rework-to-protect-independent/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
🐦🔗: https://twitter.com/globeandmail/status/1591386335096766470
Independence Lost: Why Bill C-18 Undermines An Independent Press Even as It Purports to Protect It - Michael Geist
Last week, I appeared before the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage as part of the last panel of witnesses on Bill C-18, the Online News Act. For the first time since the start of the pandemic I attended in person, which provided the opportunity to witness a scene that partly occurred off-camera. NDP MP Peter Julian started his questioning by citing with approval a Postmedia editorial, itself based on a Brian Lilley column. The editorial expressed support for Bill C-18, criticized Facebook, and took the Conservatives to task for not being more supportive of the proposed legislation. Seeing an NDP MP rely on a Lilley-inspired Postmedia editorial was strange enough, but adding to the weirdness was Liberal MP Lisa Hepfner scrambling to find the editorial on her phone and showing it around to caucus colleagues. While some might merely chalk this up to a common enemy - Facebook - I believe there is a bigger enemy at work, namely the loss of an independent press.