Bearing in mind that the word seems to be that Eugen is not super-hospitable to (all) the ideas floated by the marginalized community.
On the "CWs" topic, I saw another post that said, basically, "do your best and you'll be fine." Seems reasonable.
(Not gonna CW my politics posts, though, since that'll be most of what I post eventually.)
"(Not gonna CW my politics posts, though, since that'll be most of what I post eventually.)"
From what I observe that is what most of the fuss is about, though. People expecting all politics to be behind CWs. And people who discuss that primarily feeling constrained by such expectation.
I agree that US politics being behind a CW would be great. More than any other country, Americans seem to think the whole world is their own politics. I remember following topics on Ukraine to try and find out what was happening with a 19th C war being waged in Europe. All the Americans had overtaken them arguing about which President they considered had caused it more. Never mind what Europeans want to know - all about US.
They were doing it on hashtags and threads that were the main places people were going for news about Ukraine. I like the idea of CW so there aren’t tonnes of American navel gazing to wade through to find what you want. No one said they couldn’t discuss politics, but it does appear to be Americans who are the ones saying they won’t use them for their political thoughts. I’m just pointing out why it would be nice if they did
I'd have to CW most of what I post, so that probably won't happen. Eventually, I'll be crossposting from my blog (which will be *mostly* political), so, people who are truly interested in what I have to say (which is probably... nobody) can filter based on that.
I love links to blogs. I can open and leave on a tab on my phone, until I want/have time to read it. That’s my favourite kind of stuff to follow (and also why I always have around 20 phone tabs going at once!)