@sophie I was wondering whether this use of content warnings (CWs) can really be recommended or even expected across all the fediverse. Like, I am not sure I want to ask political activists or news outlets to prefix all their posts with a CW. Like, do I really want to ask @gretathunberg to always use CW "climate crisis" or @watch_union to use CW "depol"?
That's why I found the idea of a client-side content filter that auto-inserts CWs in my client that I have seen mentioned recently kind of intriguing. Need to check it out (find it again in the first place).
Maybe having a default CW post template that these accounts could use would be another (technical) approach.
All of which I guess boils down to my stance being: please use CWs, in particular if it's for stuff that you are not posting mostly about, but I acknowledge that you may have good reasons not to.
@sophie @gretathunberg @watch_union Obviously I have the choice of following such accounts or not, but the charm of CWs is that can decide at each moment whether I am willing to engage with that kind of content right then.
I don't want to unfollow them but there may be times when it's better for me to hide some of the stuff.
Should have said this from the start...