Elon Musk may put the entirety of Twitter behind a paywall.

Elon Musk has blabbed on and on about free speech, but if he does this, it's certainly not "free as in beer" speech. https://gizmodo.com/elon-musk-twitter-paywall-genius-idiot-nazis-tom-fitton-1849756014

Elon Musk Considers Putting All of Twitter Behind Paywall in Latest Genius Idea

The idea comes in the wake of Musk's other brilliant idea: Fire half the staff.

Gizmodo

If you're still a Twitter user, a paywall should offend you since Elon Musk is attempting to monetize content *you* have made—and not compensate you for it.

At least the New York Times' makes ethical sense. They pay their writers.

Personally, I spend $50/month to use the Fediverse.

I'm not against monetization of social media services.

But there's something profoundly icky about a Twitter paywall.

I have no doubt that putting the entirety of Twitter behind a paywall will grow the Fediverse.

But I don't celebrate this. People's entire professional livelihoods depend on Twitter being public.

@atomicpoet
I'm not. Frankly I'd be fine with a fairly large chunk of the birdsite not showing up at all. The reason it's not as toxic here is because they aren't here.
@trentskunk Have you not noticed the Twitter Migration that's happened over the past month?
@atomicpoet
Yes, so far we don't seem to have gotten many of the truly toxic people, or I've missed them. Either way it'd be nice to keep it that way.