(maybe silly) question for conference going experts - you are one of 2 discussants on a conference panel with 3 papers. how do you decide how to split up discussant duties fairly?
@MemeMedianMode Assuming an integer number of papers for each discussant, the only fair outcome is for each to discuss all papers, or none. Pareto improve from there into unfairness.
@MemeMedianMode Not a silly question at all! Could divide by areas of interest or themes? The themes could cut across all papers (or not)!