I set up sciences.social as a place where social scientists can engaging and productive conversations online.
It’ll be supported as long as folks find it useful. Let me know if you have ideas how this space should be run.
I set up sciences.social as a place where social scientists can engaging and productive conversations online.
It’ll be supported as long as folks find it useful. Let me know if you have ideas how this space should be run.
@kerstinsailer @stefanlaser This is a great question and one I'd like to get broad feedback on before putting in "policy". If posts are about social science (broadly construed) no CW. So architecture definitely OK. If they are rants, or potentially triggering, CW. But the other ones I think are in the gray zone where I think we need a some level of consensus.
Will make an announcement and ask for feedback.