Hello world. Twitter migrant and new #histodon #librarian here possibly leaving behind approx 60k good souls on the platform that sold us all out to Musk. I put in a lot of time and work on that site for over 10 years and made many great friends & contacts, so it’s sad and a bit surreal to have to start again.

But such is the nature of the unregulated social media industry, where global information systems can be upended on the whim of an erratic, uncurious and narcissistic billionaire.
It’s clear to me that Musk purchased twitter in order to destroy it. The blue checkmark is a verification mark for authenticity. This is particularly important in terms of identifying sources. To make it pay-to-play is to burn twitter's reliability as a news source, and it's reliability in general, to the ground.
Then again such social media companies are not, and have never been, a “public forum”. They are privately owned networks that have a single priority: harvesting profits. Primarily from selling their users’ information to those who which to target them. Everything else is secondary. They have shown that they cannot be trusted in any meaningful sense. We deserve much better.
Remember Google Fusion Tables? I spent many months building digital humanities resources around it. One was a WW1 map that identified the final resting place of the over 1,000 people from Limerick who lost their lives in that conflict. The other was a resource that mapped the sites of Collective Punishment of African American communities in the U.S. Many other historians built fantastic resources using it as a way to visually and spatially educate about the past. It was accessible and effective.
Then in 2019 Google erased this product. Just gone forever. I realised then that these companies are the antithesis of libraries, cultural institutions and the open source movement. They see culture, and our free labour in using their (temporary) tools, as instantly and permanently disposable ephemera to attract attention for the purpose of advertising. All that power and wealth put to use to fulfil such an empty mission.

@Limerick1914 Oh god, I'm sorry.

I remember years ago seeing @faduda saying (possibly on twitter, ironically) that everyone should have their own hosted website/blog/space online, where they post their work, and use social media/platforms to share it. Because on a whim, Zuck and pals can tweak some code, and all of 'your' work is gone.

(I should've heeded that warning, too.)

@clickhere @Limerick1914 @faduda But isn't there an equal risk that WordPress or whoever owns it or the likes of it could just turn around and change their terms of service, or fold their tents altogether?
@DrNightdub @clickhere @Limerick1914 As I understand it, Wordpress is on a GPL.
And by "own your words" I mean your own site. I own the faduda.ie domain, for example.
@faduda @clickhere @Limerick1914 OK, I get you. In that sense, it's the age-old tussle between creator and publisher. Even with old-skool books, you're still beholden to the publisher to bring what you write to a wide audience so they get to edit to an extent. WordPress folding would be the equivalent of the book you've written going out-of-print.
@DrNightdub @clickhere @Limerick1914 GPL means that "out of print" is less likely. There will almost certainly be new forks if the original iteration folds.