The European Health Data Space Regulation and its chapter on the secondary use of health data creates a legal backdoor that offers Big Tech -and everyone capable of pitching algo/health projects- easy access to troves of health data. In this paper I show how. https://brill.com/view/journals/ejhl/aop/article-10.1163-15718093-bja10099/article-10.1163-15718093-bja10099.xml
Compromises and Asymmetries in the European Health Data Space

Abstract In the post-pandemic world, the ability of researchers to reuse, for the purposes of scientific research, data that had been collected by others and for different purposes has rightfully become a policy priority. At the same time, new technologies with tremendous capacity in data aggregation and computation open new horizons and possibilities for scientific research. It is in this context that the European Commission published in May 2022 its proposal for a sector-specific regulation aiming at establishing the legal landscape and governance mechanisms for the secondary use of health data within the European Union. The ambitious project is centred on administrative efficiency and aspires to unleash the potential of new technologies. However, the quest for efficiency usually comes with privacy compromises and power asymmetries and the case of the European Health Data Space Regulation is no different. This paper draws attention to some of these compromises and suggests specific amendments.

Brill

Some of the issues discussed in the paper: over-stretched definitions of health data, controversial AI/algo-related legal bases for access to health data, and the transformation of the regime for the protection of health data into a managerial process of administrative compliance.

Thanks to the European Journal of Health Law and the reviewers for their helpful comments on earlier draft. #eupolicy