solid ad placement on the @[email protected] here

@linuxlite58 @molly0xfff The article is indeed very interesting, but there are two bad things about it. The title is misleading, it can be read as it mean something like "everything crypto is Ponzi" while the body article make it clear other meaning. Also, the image is unrelated to the article text, and it might be read as if that particular vendor in the image is related to something Ponzi while the article says nothing in that direction.

On the other hand, the adversitement is clearly a good image for the article in question, it smells like Ponzi a mile away.

@molly0xfff Genius. I guess WAPO is just trying to keep up with the NYT in "brilliance."