On the #pomo “debate”, best to keep it to the basics
http://hamishcampbell.com/2021/09/23/on-the-pomo-debate-best-to-keep-it-to-the-basics/
On the #pomo “debate”, best to keep it to the basics
http://hamishcampbell.com/2021/09/23/on-the-pomo-debate-best-to-keep-it-to-the-basics/
I can doubt this, which bit do you won't me to doubt ;) happy to have a look agen.
@witchescauldron I don't think you understand post modernity. Though I am sure I don't!
But the lack of doubt you have in thinking it's a "thing" to "debate" seems to me a clear flag that you don't understand it.
Anyway.,. it't not super important what I think. What I think is important is if you are finding it useful having a "debate".
@kat what I do understand is that #postmodernism is built of sand. Thus it has no foundations so is little worth "understanding".
I studied at university at the hight of the #pomo mess. Empirical expirence over 20 years is that people who "worship" #promo are useless for social change/challenge.
It's a useless idolatry ;)
@witchescauldron I don't think an understanding and affinity to the use value, and power of postmodernist/poststructuralist analysis is antagonistic to building movements that are in response to climate chaos.
Furthermore, I would say without such analyses your survival/revolutionary movement will likely fail by reproducing power structures and systems that are antithetical to it's stated aims.
Anyway, I look forward to reading your further discourse on this. Thanks for sharing.
X Kate
@kat my expirence being at the hart of 30 years of affective grassroots social challenge/change movements, is that people who push #postmodernist agenders are both useless to the movements and oftern directly distructive to the movements.
It's well past time to try other world views.