Perfume．．．兩邊請節制不要嚇人謝謝～ 
https://twitter.com/timesofindia/status/1266236577153462272?s=20
The Times Of India on Twitter
“No de-escalation in China stand-off Both sides have also moved forward thousands of additional troops and set up logistics supply lines, with heavy vehicles and monitoring equipment, to back their soldiers on the actual confrontation sites. https://t.co/aO4oibg8Ov”
紐時也注意到兩國關係緊張：
“Even before the scuffling, India was feeling increasingly hemmed in by China’s expanding economic and geopolitical influence in South Asia.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/30/world/asia/india-china-border.html?referringSource=articleShare
這篇報導提到五月份雙方首次摩擦的時間點是在本串首嘟05/11事件之前的05/05晚。雖說媒體的均提到雙方有針對邊界問題建立溝通機制，同一個月內發生三次以上衝突，即使在此時仍顯異常。
“The PLA and Indian Army soldiers clashed at the feature called Finger 5 in the northern flank of the Pangong lake on May 5 night.
A few days later, personnel from the two armies clashed again near Naku La in Sikkim.”
同樣是看衝突，影片可以看的門道很多。
「影片中顯示一艘印度Tampa快艇（從美國進口）攔截懸掛中國國旗的模擬中國巡邏船的演習畫面，印度快艇使用了名為“漩渦戰術”，用高速快艇不斷繞代號LX系列的“中國巡邏船”轉圈航行，將目標船隻困在水流中，迫使其開始陷入渦流時返回。依目前情況來看，該湖西部45公里長的部份地區在印度的控制下，其餘部份則在中國控制之下。
該報道引據軍事評論員黃東分析，解放軍在班公錯湖出動928D巡邏艇，行內俗稱“西海艦隊”，已集結5,000多士兵，已是一個旅的兵力，印軍也不相伯仲，“雙方已經有1萬人，可以打一場不大不小嘅戰爭”。 」
😮😮😮
[ The protest against Chinese apps comes after India in April said stricter screening rules will apply to foreign direct investments from China, worrying investors there. China has said the policy is discriminatory.
"Previous boycott calls have focused on Chinese goods, whereas this one especially targets Chinese apps, which could impact Chinese technology companies who have seen India as a crucial market," ]
https://twitter.com/adityakalra/status/1267806547725279237?s=21
“传统上和平的加勒万河现在已经成为一个热点，因为这是实控线距离印度沿着什约克河（Shyok River）修到斗拉特别奥里地（Daulet Beg Oldi）的新道路最近的点。斗拉特别奥里地是拉达克地区的实控线沿线最偏远、最薄弱的地区，”
The Diplomat對最近兩國緊張情勢的分析。
“It is true that China does not consider India to be its primary strategic competitor. However, some Chinese veterans are of the opinion that China has a history of adjusting its strategic direction and has more often than not benefitted from solving contradictions in a secondary direction first, rather than the contradictions in the primary direction.”
https://thediplomat.com/2020/06/what-is-china-saying-about-the-china-india-border-stand-off/
WAPO一篇報導對這段衝突期間作出淺白說明的分析：
“If Beijing fears other nations may view China as weak or distracted by the coronavirus and the economic aftershocks, the Chinese leadership may feel it has to take a hard line against any potential challenge to Chinese sovereignty. This is true not only regarding the border with India but also with regard to Taiwan, Hong Kong and the South China Sea.”
對印中邊界的衝突，米方態度簡單清楚：
“The Chinese Communist Party has been on this effort, on this march, for an awfully long time,” Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said last week. “They’ll certainly use a tactical situation on the ground to their advantage.”
“中共为此，为这次推进已经努力了很长时间，”国务卿迈克·庞皮欧(Mike Pompeo)上周表示。“他们肯定会在实地利用战术优势。”
https://cn.nytimes.com/world/20200608/china-india-border-himalayas/dual/
上星期推出的共和黨國安戰略報告裡，印太重點策略的定位不變。
「”中国（中共）的宏伟战略‘中国梦’是要将国际体系转变为由中共领导的体系。” 报告建议至少从五个方面反击中国。第一，抵制中国的工业间谍活动、盗窃知识产权以及其他恶意的经济行为。第二，制止中国的恶性政治影响和虚假信息宣传运动。第三，抵制中国的侵犯人权行为。第四，应对中国的全球军事现代化。第五，加强在印度太平洋地区的联盟。」
https://www.voachinese.com/amp/rsc-report-chinese-high-ranking-officials-20200611/5459206.html
米國目前科研部分的清理成績:
"至目前為止NIH已取消了77名研究者的補助資格，並有54位獲得NIH研究補助的科學家遭到開除。"
https://www.rti.org.tw/news/view/id/2068193#.XueWh-hgOGJ.facebook
法廣引述來源<Science>對米國國衛院有更詳盡的報導:
"Slightly more than one-half had been an NIH peer reviewer in the past 2 years, and 41% of those under investigation (77 scientists) have been banned from further participation in NIH’s well-regarded system of vetting grant proposals."
媒體這部分也沒放過 
:
"在被白宮點名後，美國疾病管制暨預防中心（CDC）隨即以美國之音替中共宣傳為由，要求旗下人員回絕相關採訪要求。此事在昨天被媒體揭露。"
英國也開始清理被中國滲透的媒體領域了：
“在英國，廣播法規範持有執照者，必須管控服務及編輯政策。
英國通訊管理局指出，實際上，一家名為中國環球電視網絡公司（China Global Television NetworkCorporation，CGTNC）的實體才是頻道內容的「最終決策者」。不過，環球電視網的播放執照無法移轉給CGTNC，因為背後的「最終控制者是中國共產黨，這不被英國廣播法規允許」。
英國通訊管理局表示，由於申請文件缺少關鍵資訊，無法進行執照轉移，「環球電視網多次無法答覆關鍵問題」，且未能進行重組。雖然已經給環球電視網「無數機會調整，以符合法定規範」，但仍未能達成。”
撤銷環球電視網執照的說明：
“In addition, none of the employees involved in CGTN’s decision-making, or day-to-day running of the channel, appear to be employed by SCML. CGTNC confirmed that its Global Editorial Board is the ultimate decision maker over the selection and organisation of programmes for the CGTN service and exercises editorial control.”
德國跟進。
「跨國電信公司伏德風集團（Vodafone Group）德國分公司在12日表示，已經停止在該公司所擁有的德國3個州有線電視網路中傳送CGTN頻道節目。德國其他廣播電視機構也必須陸續跟進。如果CGTN希望繼續在德國播出，必須申請新的播放牌照。」
結果轉移到法國復活：
＂CGTN在12月就開始向法國最高視聽委員會（CSA）提出申請，以期CSA在法律上認可其播出能力。因為根據法國法規，只要符合兩項技術條件便能獲得播出許可─必須透過法國衛星，也就是歐洲電信衛星（Eutelsat）播放，和必須從法國送出訊號；廣播內容並非審查項目。＂
八爪鱼@perfume63 英国应该提出如果用英语广播会下架法国节目，让CGTN去祸害法国。
以鄰為壑不好啦, 好歹是一起打過二戰的兄弟之邦啊～