If all FOSS conferences become "online events"
And If there is a FOSS conference essentially every week (as evidence suggests)
Then haven't the conferences ceased to exist and people are just posting videos online constantly?
If all FOSS conferences become "online events"
And If there is a FOSS conference essentially every week (as evidence suggests)
Then haven't the conferences ceased to exist and people are just posting videos online constantly?
@n8 As someone who, for family reasons, can't travel as much as I used to, the turn to "online events" makes them pretty attractive in some ways. I can watch all the presentations at my leisure and participate in some of the discussions. And as a presenter I can actually "attend" without all the sacrifice, begging and calendar gymnastics that I normally need (and rarely have) if I want to join.
But back to your point, yeah, the "event" characteristic does get a bit watered down by the lack of people in the same physical place for that short intense period.
@praxeology @xuv I suppose the "real" question I'd like to get at is "what aspects make it an event as opposed to a video playlist" ...
I am interested in hearing everyone's experiences about which, if any, online events they feel successfully captured "eventness" and how they did it.
@n8 @xuv One thing is definitely the notion of topic and curation. A "conference" asks for submissions in a particular format and it gets people to narrow or bend their presentation to fit the theme. Then the organizers have to sort out who and what fits and what doesn't. A good conference also makes a big effort at inclusion here too, so that some of the typically louder voices don't dominate.
And then it all gets presented in one big block, which, to me, represents a kind of discursive slice of spectrum that is, ideally, useful for advancing a lot of discussion and debate.