sanjayuvacha
Justice Nariman's dissent in the #sabarimala review, will long be cited, as a treatise on the Rule of Law and the Executive's sworn duty to uphold and implement court judgements. I urge all people to read it, as it rewards even those who have been sceptical about the court in the recent past
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/courts-should-tread-cautiously-while-dealing-with-religious-issues-149757
[Sabarimala] Courts Should Tread Cautiously While Dealing With Religious Issues: Read The Issues Referred To Larger Bench

While referring the Sabarimala case to larger bench, the majority judges observed that the matters involving the interpretation of the provisions of the Constitution touching upon the right to...

Nov 15, 2019 at 2:39amWeb
Show threadGaurav GuptaNov 15, 2019
@sanjayuvacha Sceptical because even this judgment is passed by 3:2
Dissent in minority is a crushed dissent.
Show threadRAJESH KUMAR (@rkhuria)Nov 16, 2019
@sanjayuvacha I hate to say but SC under current CJI has been a great disappointment - notably its rulings on Ram Temple, Rafale. Gogoi and other senior judges held PC ostensibly to warn nation about Govt Interference in Judicial matters. Yet Gogoi himself seemed to have succumbed to Govt pressure numerous times. Incoming CJI Bobde says - Govt can’t be a rubber stamp to Judicial Appointments, thus diluting role of the Collegium at the very outset.
Show threadठोलारामNov 17, 2019
@rkhuria @sanjayuvacha Sometimes I feel that press conference move was preplanned to fool people.
Show threadRAJESH KUMAR (@rkhuria)Nov 17, 2019
@TholaRam @sanjayuvacha It seemed quite genuine and honest. Tide turned after molestation charges though we did not know immediately and kept wondering why he had suddenly transformed
Show threadSharmaNov 17, 2019
@sanjayuvacha good to see you back Sir!!