Manu Sebastian മനു

#AyodhyaVerdict Is Not A Precedent To Correct Alleged Historic Wrongs By Previous Rulers

I write for @[email protected] https://www.livelaw.in/columns/ayodhya-verdict-is-not-a-precedent-to-correct-alleged-historic-wrongs-by-previous-rulers-149654#.XcfonshyRjI.twitter

Ayodhya Verdict Is Not A Precedent To Correct Alleged Historic Wrongs By Previous Rulers

The Court traveled back in time only for the limited purpose of examining the claims of possession, and not to adjudicate on an alleged historic wrong.

Nov 10, 2019 at 10:42amMastodon Twitter Crossposter
Show threadManu Sebastian മനുNov 10, 2019
The Court traveled back in time only for the limited purpose of examining the claims of possession, and not to adjudicate on an alleged historic wrong.
#Ayodhya
Show threadManu Sebastian മനുNov 10, 2019
The Court has not concluded that a temple existed underneath the mosque. The verdict is based on evidence of competing claims of possession, though questions remain about the mode of appreciation of evidence. 
#AyodhyaCase
Show threadManu Sebastian മനുNov 10, 2019

The Supreme Court's judgment is not based on the finding that the mosque was built after demolishing an existing temple.

#AyodhyaJudgment #BabriMasjidverdict

Show threadKarunaNov 10, 2019

@manuvichar

Now to occupy a mosque, Just put idols near the place and start a fight. Then petition the court. Final verdict will give you the rights over the property.