1. So, the #AYODHYAVERDICT will be out at 10:30 am on Saturday, 9 November.
CJI Ranjan Gogoi had conducted a special meeting with UP officers regarding law and order on Friday morning.
We'll be reporting live from the Supreme Court in the morning @[email protected] 1/n
2. We have a live blog already running with all the updates from inside and outside the court @[email protected]
#AYODHYAVERDICT
https://www.thequint.com/news/india/ayodhya-supreme-court-verdict-for-ram-mandir-babri-masjid
3. Remember, this is not about demolition of the #BabriMasjid in 1992.
This title dispute is about the disputed 2.77 acres of land where the mosque stood, which Hindus claim is the #RamJanmabhoomi .
Details of the case & arguments here @[email protected]
https://www.thequint.com/explainers/ayodhya-dispute-supreme-court-arguments-of-hindu-muslim-parties-what-to-expect-verdict
5. Who are the judges who heard the case? What kind of questions did they ask? What judgments are they famous for?
Profiles of the five-judge Constitution Bench which will deliver the #AYODHYAVERDICT here @[email protected] :
https://www.thequint.com/news/law/who-are-the-five-judges-ayodhya-verdict-constitution-bench-cji-gogoi-justices-bobde-chandrachud-bhushan-nazeer
6. Almost time for the #AYODHYAVERDICT .
Will the judges decide to give the land to one party? Could they do what the Allahabad High Court did and split the land? Or could they say that nobody has established title, meaning govt gets to decide what to do?
9. First thing the five judge bench announces is that an appeal by the Shia Waqf Board (not the Sunni Waqf Board, a main party to the dispute) has been dismissed.
Shia Board had tried a case in the 1940s over this, had tried here again to raise claims over the site. @[email protected]
10. BIG BREAKING on #AYODHYAVERDICT :
Nirmohi Akhara's suit declared as barred by limitation.
Also, they are not the shebaits for worship of Lord Ram and the Ram Mandir, test of exclusive rights of management not fulfilled. @[email protected]
11. BIG BREAKING on #AYODHYAVERDICT :
#RamJanmbhoomi declared not to be a juristic person - along with Ram Lalla, the land itself has claimed to be a deity with legal personhood and was recognised as such by the Allahabad High Court.
SC has rejected this claim. @[email protected]
12. BIG BREAKING on #AYODHYAVERDICT :
Ram Lalla has been declared a juristic person.
Court says ASI report notes existence of non-Islamic structure at site which predates the mosque, but doesn't include a finding that a temple was destroyed to build the #BabriMasjid
@[email protected]
14. BIG BREAKING on #AYODHYAVERDICT :
Suit for possession by Sunni Waqf Board is NOT barred by limitation. Limitation period was 12 years (Section 142 Limitation Act), so was filed within permissible time period. @[email protected]
16. #AYODHYAVERDICT :
Muslims have not been able to establish possessory title to inner courtyard.
Hindus have shown unimpeded access to outer courtyard.
Muslims did not abandon mosque. @[email protected]
17. BIG BREAKING on #AYODHYAVERDICT
Centre to set up trust to deal with the disputed site.
Hindus showed possession of outer courtyard. Muslims couldn't show exclusive access to the inner courtyard before 1857. @[email protected]
18. BIG BREAKING on #AYODHYAVERDICT :
Muslims to be allotted five acres elsewhere, can build a mosque. Destruction of #BabriMasjid was against rule of law. @[email protected]
19. The Trust set up by Central Government in consultation with State Government can take any steps necessary to build a #RamMandir .
The Nirmohi Akhara is to be given representation in this exercise.
VakashaS
prahlad
Contractor Jay