@tariqueanwar How did the Mughals rule for so long?
One answer: They didn't, really. After 1739, when Nadir Shah trampled all over Delhi, Mughal authority was more in theory than in practice. The theory mattered, of course. But that's another question, namely: Why did people find Mughal power a useful model long after the Mughals had ceased to wield land-based authority?
@driveAKar Q: Was Akbar one of the greatest kings ever?
A: It depends on how you define "great." I remain skeptical and critical of modern value assessments of the Mughal past. I would counter with another question: Why does it matter to you (or your friend who posed the question) whether Akbar was great or not? What rides on that answer, in 2019, for you?
@Ryche Q: What is the best incident / episode from Mughal India on which to base a film?
A: Depends on genre. And, really, why choose among the stars in the sky? For tragic love, Aurangzeb and Hirabai. For power couple love, Nur Jahan and Jahangir. For dark drama, the Sayyid brothers rise and fall. For daring drama, Shivaji's escape from Aurangzeb's court. For horror, the sieges of Chittor (Akbar) or Bijapur (Aurangzeb). For family drama, Jahangir's rebellion. I could go on at some length...
@Kasheer Q: Did Babur conduct an invasion when he established the Mughal Empire?
A: Yes, but of the Delhi Sultanate, not of India. There was no India, in political terms, to invade in 1526. Babur invaded and overthrew another Muslim-led polity.
@Koshy Q: Are the Mughals descendants of the Mongols?
A: Yes. The Mughals--as we call them--claimed descent from both the Mongols and the Timurids. They and everybody else in their time considered the Timurid lineage more illustrious, so that was usually emphasized. It's really an accident of modern historiography that we refer to them as the Mughals.
" It's really an accident of modern historiography that we refer to them as the Mughals."
Can you expand a little on this, would the term Mughal be foreign to the "Mughals"? Is their a term they themselves used to refer to their dynasty?
How many Mughal rulers were "Non-Indian"?
Did any Mughal ruler go back to his country? Like the British went back?
@Samchoudhury Q: How many Mughal rulers were non-Indian?
A: It depends on how you define Indian. If you mean a resident of India, all Mughal rulers were Indian. If you mean someone who spoke an Indian language, they were all Indian (Persian being an Indian language at this point in time). If you mean sometime with Rajput blood, from Jahangir forward they were Indian (although note that by this definition most modern Indians aren't Indian, curiously).
Thank You Audrey
This brings up a million more question 😊
Will keep bugging you every now and then
@karmariaz Q: How many battles did Aurangzeb fight?
A: I'd have to count it all up; a lot.
@st_in Q: How much imagination comes into play when historians construct narratives about the past?
A: It depends on the historian to some degree. When historians go too far in this regard, they usually get criticized. For my comments on tellings of Mughal history that are overly imaginative rather than solidly historical, see: https://openthemagazine.com/lounge/books/mughal-lite/
INDIA IS GRIPPED by Mughal fever these days. Seemingly obsessed with premodern India’s most famous empire, the saffron brigade works tirelessly to scrub Modi’s India clean of vestiges of the Mughals by writing them out of school textbooks, renaming cities and roads, and neglecting Mughal monuments. When Hindu nationalists are not marginalising the Mughals, they … Continue reading "Mughal Lite"
1..was Akbar truly benevolent and tolerant towards all religions?
2. we have read about Akbar and birbal when we were children. were they both really close ?
@ionhandshaker Q: Why didn't the din-i ilahi take off much.
A: Because it was not intended to be a large-scale phenomenon. The din-i ilahi was not a new religion, despite its reputation as such in the popular sphere; note that historians are basically in agreement on this point. Akbar's din-i ilahi was an imperial discipleship program designed for an small cadre of Mughal elites.
@TheStyleWallah Q: Who is the most mis-represented Mughal royal figure?
A: Aurangzeb Alamgir.
@audreytruschke I'm stretching the what-ifs to an event that happened very long ago. How do you judge Dara Shikoh? Is it possible to use historical tools to speculate how the Mughal-Maratha relations would have turned out had Dara Shikoh became the emperor instead of Aurangzeb?*
* I visited Khooni Darwaza ten days ago, so I got reminded of him when I saw your toot.
* Administrative reforms under Mughal rule. (Adopted from others like Sher Shah Suri; innovated on existing and new ones)
* Art and culture