Aweigh is an open source navigation system that does not rely on satellites: it is inspired by the mapping of celestial bodies and the polarized vision of insects.
https://www.aweigh.io/

/cc: @neauoire @rek
#solarpunk

aweigh – When Performance Matters

decentralize × distribute × reposition A navigation technology that does not rely on satellites. Aweigh is an open navigation system

aweigh
@xuv @neauoire @rek Does it really work, or is it another of these "design concepts"? I've seen several from the Royal College of Art before that turned out to depend on non-existent hypothetical technology.
@mattskala @neauoire @rek That's a very good question. I did not take this into account. I guess one of us will have to try.
@xuv @neauoire @rek One reason I'm doubtful is that if this worked to the kind of accuracy that's implied, then the military would already be using it; and they don't seem to be.

@mattskala @xuv @neauoire @rek The SR-71 used to have navigation based on well-known stars, but the aweigh home page only says that it measures the sun's position. So that would be "celestial body" not "celestial bodies".

It also needs a real-time clock. I'm not sure if the SR-71's star tracker had that problem.

@CharredStencil @xuv @neauoire @rek A lot depends on the precision. If you need real time to one second, okay, no big deal although setting your clock accurately without using a reference that ultimately comes from GPS will be interesting. If you need microseconds, not so easy. Similarly, measuring the position of a star (including the Sun) to one degree is a lot easier than to one second of arc.
@CharredStencil @xuv @neauoire @rek Traditional celestial navigation (with a sextant and so on) can do star positions to one second of arc, which is what you need to even approach GPS, but only with expensive precision optics and a trained user. For doing it automatically, optical encoders good to that precision are *to this day* on the export-restricted-because-of-military-applications list, at least from Canada.