emma clare 🌻
Community Moderator NoëlleIt should go without saying - I cannot believe that I have to say this - that if you're under 18, DO NOT POST NUDES. Don't do it. Don't. Do not. If you're under 18 and you think it might be a good idea to post naked photos of yourself here, instead: DON'T. It is a BAD IDEA.
chrissyamber@CM_noelle There are parents getting arrested and put on watch lists for candid photos of their own god damned kids what do you think they would do to complete strangers on the internet just because you wanted to show some skin? They've arrested people under 18, the poster of the nude pic, and the recipient, for child porn even though they are children, when it was of them. This is srs bsn. Don't do it. Anywhere. Not until you're 18.
Paul Free (14 â’¶, europe)@CM_noelle well being naked is the most natural way to be as a human.
If law is sayn different, don't fear the law, but fear those who are afraid of steping over it.
What should be supported:
- freedom if it's not suppression others
What we should stop:
- sexual exploration
- sexualisation of things which just aren't
@paulfree14 Sorry, we're not going to change our community guidelines or terms of service to allow underage nudity of any kind.
@CM_noelle ...that's what I thought. But somehow a funny concept 'underage nudity'.
Like:
c: Hi you what's your age?
b: 6 month, why?
c: that's underage nudity, get on your clothes and tell your mom that next time she will resieve a fine for that
But what if theres a picture of a slut walk with a couple of people on it from age 5 - 99? ....or do I missunderstand the word nudity? Isn't it just being without clothes?
(what I don't need on mastodon: sexual content. )
@paulfree14 It would be inappropriate for me to discuss the philosophy of nudity and sexualization here. Our moderation policy is informed by Germany making nude images of children illegal; the owner of the site can be prosecuted for publishing them, and our rules protect him and the rest of the members of the site.