I'm not happy with how the Wil Wheaton situation was resolved. An admin was overwhelmed with frivolous reports about him and felt forced to exile him. I've said before that I think it sets a dangerous precedent on how a large group of people can mobilize to drive anyone off the fediverse. Mob rule is universally dangerous: Mods and admins must examine evidence and decide based on wrongdoing and danger, and not on how many times someone was reported.
@Gargron so the frivolous reports he and his sycophants filed were extremely cool and acceptable?
@bluepurplerain No, I am not saying that. But I've seen some reports coming from mastodon.social users *about* messages sent to Wil Wheaton, and *those* I can attest were not frivolous. There were rather graphic/violent messages there.
@Gargron @bluepurplerain Can we have screenshot of this messages ?
@Neea @Gargron @bluepurplerain They'd have to exist for there to be screen shots. It's easy to invent abuse when you're the creator of the platform and people are mad at you for a series of bad, selfish, and harmful decisions.

@mlubert @Neea @Gargron @bluepurplerain I can confirm that I reported several abusive toots.

But hey, perhaps I’m a false flag operation, and every message sent was actually filled with love?

@piersb

care to give us an example of what you reported that was abusive?

@piersb @Neea @Gargron @bluepurplerain Again, prove it. But nobody took screenshots? Not a SINGLE ONE?

@piersb @Neea @Gargron @bluepurplerain Mods: "Hey, here's the abuse some people sent to him"

Everyone: "Wow, that's bad. We can see now why you overreacted in your response."

Instead, Mods: "Here's 3 conflicting reasons we can't prove and we're gonna call him the victim of an attack when in reality it's people reporting a known bad faith arguer who has a history of anti-trans behavor and support and who actively supports a rapist who's playing the victim card AGAIN"