“Twitter but better” is 100% how Mastodon promotes itself
@robcorr It is *different* which makes it a better fit for what a lot of people who dislike  actually want/need.
But not all.
@jpwarren Yeah, I get that. But it would be wrong to dismiss that confusion/those concerns when the Mastodon PR push is very much “it’s Twitter but we fixed the bad bits”.
@robcorr Oh I agree! It's why I'm trying to understand what's really going on rather than reacting to the surface explanations that are fairly… visceral?
This is a bit close to my day job, but it's the fun part of my job, so.
@jpwarren @robcorr I can appreciate the nuance of "this message is not actually secure for x reasons" but plenty wont.
@posty @robcorr The challenge is perfection versus merely good. Do we not provide the semi-private /msg functionality at all because some at-risk people might use it who shouldn't and wait until we get it built perfectly,
or do we have it, but design it so it's harder for at-risk people to use wrong?

@jpwarren @robcorr I have written thoughts about this issue.

In short - I propose - DMs are off by default. You have to make an explicit choice to use them and understand the risks.

how? read for more.
https://github.com/tootsuite/mastodon/issues/6945

Admin setting to disable DMs on instance · Issue #6945 · tootsuite/mastodon

DMs can currently be viewed by admins. This is well known and instance admins are encouraged to mention this in their privacy settings. But for some instances it's better to disable DMs all tog...

@posty @jpwarren I think I agree with you.
@posty @jpwarren I suppose the same issue affects locked accounts generally, though. But I think the nature of DMs is that people *feel* like they are more secure (or should be) and that’s the real issue.