@michaelfolkson
Also I was interested to hear John describe his general vision be similar to what a lot of other people, including myself, are thinking: Bitcoin should hopefully trend towards being near-exclusively a verification engine, not for execution (of contracts). This implies better privacy and scalability, and means "off-chain" in the most abstract sense.
There are a number of sources, talks, writeups, which talk about this issue. I'll try to link one or two in followups to this.
Here's a twitter thread I wrote a few months back on discovering an interesting old presentation doc written by Maxwell/Wuille a few years ago (it's linked in the first tweet): https://twitter.com/waxwing__/status/988033817087807488
It covers a lot of these concepts. I think v. helpful to get a clearer idea of how BTC both does, and should, work.
Not really I think.
Another recommendation is to watch one of Andrew Poelstra's recent talks, all of which (except one about bulletproof technicals) have been about scriptless scripts, and he tends to elucidate a similar set of ideas. The one in Boston is a good choice I think: https://youtu.be/jzoS0tPUAiQ?t=3h44m31s
This old post from Greg Maxwell is actually a critique of Ethereum's approach, but it's kind of talking about similar things. Rather interesting: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1427885.msg14601127#msg14601127
Probably a good idea to ask kanzure (Bryan Bishop) for a link to his archives. He stores basically all papers, transcripts he can lay his hands on. Easy to find him at #bitcoin-wizards if you do IRC (freenode).
@Crypt0Physicist @michaelfolkson
The usual answer: Will be on youtube, probably quite quickly (mine took about a month though).
Hi, see other answer, it will be on youtube.
@Gabridome @michaelfolkson @Crypt0Physicist
Video of talk is up: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f33HlAvJUFw