J'ai vraiment du mal avec le furrysme. On est d'accord qu'au fond le principe c'est de fanstamer sur des animaux hein. Même antropomorphisés, la partie théoriquement intéressante c'est celle animale.

Du coup j'arrive pas à ne pas voir le spectre de la zoophilie (qui n'est pas la bestialité je sais) et heu... Bof quoi.

...

Oui il est possible que je vous juge intérieurement, je l'admets. =/

Quelqu'un pour m'expliquer en quoi j'ai tort ou raté le point comme disent les anglo-saxons ?

Je lance le sujet parce que j'ai l'impression qu'il y a une tendance au pouet furry dans mon feed récemment ^^
@Jared (apologies for language barrier)
#Furries are usually so marginalized socially, living perpetually on the fringe of relevance, we often find ourselves arriving early to the "cutting edge" of whatever is hot or new. People who always look for what is uncommon are often uncommon themselves :p

@Cyclone_Dusk
I totally get that furries are marginalized people, i don't mean to bully anyone here. I just feel unconfortable with that hobby(?) /fetish because even though there's a huge gap between enjoying sexualized anthropomorphic animals and ACTUAL zoophilia i can't help but find those too closely related

I have no problem with any sex fetish nor orientation as long it's between consenting responsible people. But, as you might guess from my previous sentence, we're kinda crossing the line since i'm not sure furry art depicts people but rather animals...

I guess my problem is wider since i'm not confortable with rape fantasies, nor loli

Maybe the real question is : is it okay to fantasize on "wrong" or illegal things ? And more widely what is wrong. Cause we know that some perfectly fine things are still illegal in some places. And the other way around i guess.

Sorry for the huge post. Hope my point is clear and yet not too judgy ? I'm trying to understand and be understood not to convice anyone i'm right and they're wrong :)