Just did a #RECAP download for the amended complaint (Nov. 6) in Walsh v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. #CIPA #privacy #privateRightOfAction
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69643824/walsh-v-dollar-tree-stores-inc/
Under California law, we can hold companies accountable for passing people's personal info to Meta. We already have a strong privacy law that is letting juries take action, as they did in the Flo case. #privateRightOfAction
Please make sure your address is up to date on your voter registration—you might be able to make a difference in a future case
Just did a #RECAP download for the amended complaint (Nov. 6) in Walsh v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. #CIPA #privacy #privateRightOfAction
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69643824/walsh-v-dollar-tree-stores-inc/
Appeals Court rules that only US government can sue to enforce Voting Rights Act
Shock ruling from Republican-appointed appeals court prevents outside groups or citizens seeking to enforce voting rights law
A federal appeals court shocked voting rights groups on Monday with a ruling that 😱only the US government, not outside groups or citizens, could sue to enforce the Voting Rights Act’s provisions.😱
The civil rights law, which outlaws racial discrimination as it relates to voting, has typically been enforced by lawsuits from these groups, not by the government itself.
Now that the Republican-appointed eighth circuit court of appeals has made the ruling by 2-1, this♦️ “private right of action”♦️ to enforce Section 2 of the law is called into question.
The ruling stemmed from a case brought by the 🔸Arkansas State Conference NAACP and Arkansas Public Policy Panel 🔸over new maps created during redistricting that the two groups allege diluted the voting power of Black voters in the state.
While courts at all levels have allowed private claims seeking to enforce the voting rights law for decades, this is an “assumption that rests of flimsy footing”, the opinion written by Judge David Stras, who was appointed by Donald Trump, said.
The ruling dissected the law itself, finding it did not include specific language that allows anyone aside from the attorney general to bring enforcement action.
In a 👉dissenting opinion, Chief Judge Lavenski Smith said that, though the courts may not have directly addressed the idea of private parties trying to enforce this law, it has repeatedly heard these cases, so it would follow that 🔺“existing precedent that permits citizens to seek a judicial remedy”.🔺
The ruling is not simply an esoteric question of law: it would 🔥dismantle the primary mechanism voting rights groups use to protect against racial discrimination in voting, often in the form of lawsuits challenging electoral maps.
Voting rights groups expect the 🙏🏻ruling will be appealed to the US supreme court🙏🏻. The eighth circuit ruling applies to the states the circuit court covers: Arkansas, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota and South Dakota.
Wendy Weiser, the vice-president for democracy at the Brennan Center for Justice, called the decision “radical” and wrote on X that it was “deeply wrong, and it goes against decades of precedent and practice”.
#vra #privaterightofaction
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/nov/20/voting-rights-act-appeals-court-ruling?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other
It's only because of the GPDR has a #PrivateRightOfAction - the right of individuals to sue to enforce their rights - that we're finally seeing the beginning of the end of commercial surveillance in Europe:
It's true that NIMBYs can abuse private rights of action, bringing bad faith cases to slow or halt good projects. But just as the answer to bad regulations is good ones, so too is the answer to bad private rights of action good ones.
43/
EFF has initial objections to the latest draft of the American Data Privacy Protection Act, or the ADPPA (H.R. 8152), passed this week. Before a floor vote, we urge the House to fix the bill and use this historic opportunity to strengthen—not diminish—the country's privacy landscape now and for years to come.
They have conspicuously failed to call for any kind of working solution, like a federal privacy law that would ban commercial surveillance, and extend a #PrivateRightOfAction, so people could sue tech giants and data-brokers who violated the law, without having to convince a regulator, DA or Attorney General to bestir themselves:
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2019/01/you-should-have-right-sue-companies-violate-your-privacy
17/
It is not enough for government to pass laws that protect consumers from corporations that harvest and monetize their personal data. It is also necessary for these laws to have bite, to ensure companies do not ignore them. The best way to do so is to empower ordinary consumers to bring their own...
the only jobs Republicans don't care about are plaintiffs lawyers, apparently.
But FTC regs take time to pass, and it can be hard for ordinary individuals to trigger their enforcement, which might leave you at the mercy of your local officials when your privacy is invaded. What we really need is a privacy law with a #PrivateRightOfAction - the right to go to court on your own:
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2019/01/you-should-have-right-sue-companies-violate-your-privacy
9/
It is not enough for government to pass laws that protect consumers from corporations that harvest and monetize their personal data. It is also necessary for these laws to have bite, to ensure companies do not ignore them. The best way to do so is to empower ordinary consumers to bring their own...