(1984) : Hewitt, Carl de Jong, Peter
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5196-5_6
#open_systems #distributed_systems #modularity #MAS #message_passing #my_bibtex
Drossopoulou and Noble argue persuasively for the need for a means to express policy in object-capability-based systems. We investigate a practical means to realize their aim via the Curry-Howard isomorphism. Specifically, we investigate representing policy as types in a behavioral type system for the RHO-calculus, a reflective higher-order variant of the pi-calculus.
Software architects use a number of commonly-recognized "styles" to guide their design of system structures. Each of these is appropriate for some classes of problems, but none is suitable for all problems. How, then, does a software designer choose an architecture suitable for the problem at hand? Two kinds of information are required: (1) careful discrimination among the candidate architectures and (2) design guidance on how to make appropriate choices. In this paper, we support careful discrimination with a preliminary classification of styles. We use a 2D classification strategy with control and data issues as the dominant organizing axes. We position the major styles within this space and use finer-grained discriminations to elaborate variations on the styles. This provides a framework for organizing design guidance, which we partially flesh out with rules of thumb.
Software architects use a number of commonly-recognized "styles" to guide their design of system structures. Each of these is appropriate for some classes of problems, but none is suitable for all problems. How, then, does a software designer choose an architecture suitable for the problem at hand? Two kinds of information are required: (1) careful discrimination among the candidate architectures and (2) design guidance on how to make appropriate choices. In this paper, we support careful discrimination with a preliminary classification of styles. We use a 2D classification strategy with control and data issues as the dominant organizing axes. We position the major styles within this space and use finer-grained discriminations to elaborate variations on the styles. This provides a framework for organizing design guidance, which we partially flesh out with rules of thumb.