Maria is at #CPDPLatAm2023.

Yesterday she ran a session testing a card game designed to support conversations about collective and participatory data governance. It was great to be joined by an enthusiastic and engaged group of people, and much fun was had.

If you'd like to read more about the game we're developing with Jessica Metheringham, from Dissent Games, you can see our write up of the first public play at #DataJustice2023 here: http://connectedbydata.org/blog/2023/07/07/governance-game-playtest

Gaming governance - initial play-testing a resource to explore participation methods

At the Data Justice Conference in Cardiff a few weeks ago we ran the first public play test of a card game designed to support conversations about collective and participatory data governance. It’s the first iteration of the output from our participation design lab process exploring game design both as a method for researching methods to involve communities in data governance, and as a way of generating resources that might help inspire and embed new ways of working, particularly within private sector contexts.

new blog post: 'The political intervention in AI that we need right now...' (opening remarks for the panel on 'Political Interventions in Data and AI' at #DataJustice2023) https://danmcquillan.org/the-political-intervention-in-ai-that-we-need-right-now.html
#AI #resistingAI #datajustice
The political intervention in AI that we need right now...

#DataJustice2023 closing plenary highlighting 'moments of solidarity' between different parts of society (e.g. around A-Level Algorithm when letter from head of Eton, student grassroots campaigns and protests, legal cases all aligned) as critical points of collective power.

Also need to build bridges with those 'inside tech' who are concerned about current directions, and want change.

No one strategy, but many elements in a movement for change.

#DataJustice2023 Karine Getelet and Sandrine Lambert reporting on their work exploring Council of Europe Consultations on AI.

Highlighting concurrent consultation mechanisms on AI creating confusion/loss of coherence in civil society engagement: capacity limited civil society orgs had to choose where to engage.

Significant for upcoming period with *lots* more different AI governance engagement: highlights need to make engagement legible so citizens and CSOs know what to engage with.

#DataJustice2023 Linnet Taylor discussing the Global Data Justice project conclusions, on operationalising a new norm for data: https://globaldatajustice.org/ and the challenges of introducing a people- and community-centric norm of data governance in discussion at UCTAD, WTO or G20.

"Data stewardship as it is getting operationalised at the highest level, is being used to pull data and control of data away from communities. We need to challenge that."

Home - Global Data Justice

A globally inclusive dialogue about the future of data The Global Data Justice project focuses on the diverse debates and processes occurring around data governance in different regions, to draw out overarching principles and needs that can push data technologies’ governance in the direction of social justice.     More about us This project has […]

Global Data Justice

In #DataJustice2023 Online Panel discussion Stefano Calzati is outlining the case for move from trying to insert needs of one group into governance (e.g. pushing to citizen centric data governance), to calling for a broader systemic change to achieve data governance ecosystems that balance different stakeholders.

An interesting strategic approach - from targeting specific actors to thinking (eco-)systemically.

(Full detail in this paper: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/data-and-policy/article/fourth-way-to-the-digital-transformation-the-data-republic-as-a-fair-data-ecosystem/5143C2FA92DCA173689295483A07AB7C)

A fourth way to the digital transformation: The data republic as a fair data ecosystem | Data & Policy | Cambridge Core

A fourth way to the digital transformation: The data republic as a fair data ecosystem - Volume 5

Cambridge Core

#DataJustice2023 Natalie summing up with four key challenges to integration of participatory practice in data governance in justice space:

- Culture
- Courts "are not a service"
- Legal exceptionalism
- Paternalism

Judicial culture seeks to be insulated from outside pressure, but this can create resistance to public input.

Courts not bound by GDPR; and courts generally exempt from FOI, leading to low familiarity in courts with responsible data agendas.

Hearing from Dr Natalie Byrom at #DataJustice2023 talking about how digitisation and datafication of court judgements shifts implications of 'open justice' in practice, with services like https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ - and highlighting lack of public awareness of, and engagement with, decisions to change how court records are shared online.
Find case law

At #DataJustice2023 conference in Cardiff for @ConnectedByData this week where we'll be running the first play test of our game designed to explore different approaches to engaging communities around tech development and to embed participatory data governance
Fascinating work by Juan Diego Castaneda showing serious implications of Colombia’s Sisbén welfare scoring system with no redress mechanisms. Public officials not understanding that the score can be wrong: Q: 'Who is in charge of correcting the mistake. A: 'There are no mistakes, only disagreement with the score.' #DataJustice2023