Closing Arguments in OpenAI Trial Highlight Disputes Between Musk and Altman Over Company Conduct

The trial examining whether OpenAI and its executives misused the nonprofit for personal gain is nearing its conclusion in Oakland, California. Elon Musk's lawyer, Steven Molo, questioned the credibility of OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, arguing that five witnesses testified to Altman being untrustworthy. Musk's team also accused OpenAI of prioritizing investor profits over AI safety, criticizing co-founder Greg Brockman's substantial personal stake. Microsoft was also implicated, with Musk's lawyers claiming the company enabled OpenAI's actions. OpenAI's legal team countered that Musk was aware of the organization's fundraising needs and had a personal interest in controlling the company, pointing to his past attempts to integrate OpenAI with Tesla and his creation of xAI. They argued Musk's lawsuit, filed in August 2024, was too late given his prior knowledge of OpenAI's growth plans, and challenged claims that he did not review key investment documents. Both sides presented closing arguments, and the nine-person jury is expected to deliberate soon. The trial will also consider potential remedies if Musk wins, including restructuring and damages, while no remedies apply if he loses.