It is often said that the standards for patent protection are higher than the standards for copyright protection. Specifically, commentators assert that the cop
It is often said that the standards for patent protection are higher than the standards for copyright protection. Specifically, commentators assert that the cop
Stepping back from the merits, are these really the kinds of designs we should be patenting? Are they actually ornamental? Original? Or are these just backdoor utility models?
patents.google.com/patent/USD94...#SubFeistDesigns
Key point: Copyright already protects disembodied designs--assuming they can meet copyright's (low!) standards.
Copyright is free. So why would people want to pay (a lot) more to get design patents?
Among other reasons, it's to get protection for #SubFeistDesigns.
See generally:
It is often said that the standards for patent protection are higher than the standards for copyright protection. Specifically, commentators assert that the cop