I think I might also classify these as #SubFeistDesigns
Side note: Here are the plaintiff's design patents. #SubFeistDesigns
Okay, so I pulled the final (high image quality) patent and there are, in fact, some solid lines. Still #SubFeistDesigns imho
Also tagging this one for #SubFeistDesigns

Uncreative Designs
Uncreative Designs

It is often said that the standards for patent protection are higher than the standards for copyright protection. Specifically, commentators assert that the cop

Uncreative Designs

It is often said that the standards for patent protection are higher than the standards for copyright protection. Specifically, commentators assert that the cop

Stepping back from the merits, are these really the kinds of designs we should be patenting? Are they actually ornamental? Original? Or are these just backdoor utility models? patents.google.com/patent/USD94... #SubFeistDesigns

USD947944S1 - Roll of pre-cut ...
USD947944S1 - Roll of pre-cut strips of tape - Google Patents

Key point: Copyright already protects disembodied designs--assuming they can meet copyright's (low!) standards. Copyright is free. So why would people want to pay (a lot) more to get design patents? Among other reasons, it's to get protection for #SubFeistDesigns. See generally:

Uncreative Designs
Uncreative Designs

It is often said that the standards for patent protection are higher than the standards for copyright protection. Specifically, commentators assert that the cop