Suppose you've designed a study and found a "null" result, and you'd like to argue that you've found evidence against the phenomenon in question producing a large effect. Should you emphasize how statistically powerful your study was?
You can, but there are much better ways to describe the evidence. Provide an upper bound on the plausible magnitude of the effect given the theory tests your data permit. For example, report a confidence interval. [1/3]
#Statistics #StatsTeaching #PowerAnalysis
You can, but there are much better ways to describe the evidence. Provide an upper bound on the plausible magnitude of the effect given the theory tests your data permit. For example, report a confidence interval. [1/3]
#Statistics #StatsTeaching #PowerAnalysis
