There is something very satisfying about doing the writing (rather than the writing admin).
There is something very satisfying about doing the writing (rather than the writing admin).
I usually use an example to make the 17th century concept of reality and perfection as something gradual more plausible to my students and tell them we'd all agree that I am more real and thus more perfect than Harry Potter. It usually really helps them to accept the basic idea.
Now today I wanted to exclude any reference to a certain author from my classroom and went for being more real and thus more perfect than Gandalf instead. The students promptly rejected that claim.
Today's questions are
The corporeal turn: What is it? Why is it? How do I implement it in my first chapter? Who came up with the term? Were phenomenologists just jealous when the incredibly fancy-sounding "linguistic turn" came up and wanted a turn of their own? Is it mostly a cultural studies thing by now or does it have any philosophical merit?
Let's find out.
There was a weird moment where I had to tell someone "Sorry I can't hang today, I want to keep reading this fascinating book on Dilthey's philosophy of history" and they just looked at me like I was talking complete gibberish.
Let's just say that I may be into the most boring philosophy ever right now and I srsly don't know how I got here.
Today I read several super helpful papers on Dilthey's anthropology.
I also made it beyond Kant's chapter on phaenomena and noumena in the Critique of Pure Reason and to his criticism of Leibniz' Monadology. I have never ventured this far. So exciting. #Philosophy #PhilosopherAtWork
I finished the highly informative text which practically had lightbulbs appear over my head regarding Plessner's attempt to extend Kant's Transcendental Arsthetics.
I still have some additional reading energy left, so after a short break I shall read a paper on whether German philosopher Wilhelm Dilthey (1833-1911) can be considered a Neo-Kantian. #philosopheratwork