RAPPLER | Philippine & World News | Investigative Journalism | Data | Civic Engagement | Public Interest4d agoAtin Ito in Cebu: West Philippine Sea matters more now amid energy emergency
https://fed.brid.gy/r/https://www.rappler.com/philippines/cebu-forum-west-philippine-sea-atin-ito/
RAPPLER | Philippine & World News | Investigative Journalism | Data | Civic Engagement | Public Interest4d agoHindi Ito Marites: The Philippine Coast Guard, sleeping with the enemy?
RAPPLER | Philippine & World News | Investigative Journalism | Data | Civic Engagement | Public Interest5d agoChina moves to block entrance to Scarborough Shoal, images show
Why Predictability Increases Risk in the West Philippine Sea
By Cliff Potts, CSO, and Editor-in-Chief of WPS News
Baybay City, Leyte, Philippines — April 14, 2026
The Problem: Repetition Creates Opportunity
Maritime operations become easier to disrupt when they follow predictable patterns.
Fixed resupply dates, repeated routes, and consistent timing allow interfering vessels to plan ahead. Once patterns are identified, positioning assets becomes simpler. Interference shifts from reactive to pre-positioned.
This reduces effort. It also increases success rates.
Predictability turns routine operations into scheduled targets.
How Pattern Recognition Works in Practice
Maritime environments are observable.
Vessel movements can be tracked through radar, visual observation, and automatic identification systems. Even without complete data, repeated behavior creates patterns that can be inferred.
If a resupply mission departs at similar times each month and follows the same route, it can be anticipated. If patrols operate on fixed cycles, gaps can be identified.
Interference relies on this predictability.
Why Variation Disrupts Interference
Variation forces uncertainty.
When departure times shift, routes change, and mission durations vary, interference becomes harder to coordinate. Assets must remain on station longer. Coverage must expand. Timing becomes less reliable.
This increases cost and reduces efficiency.
Variation does not eliminate interference. It reduces its precision.
Controlled Unpredictability as a Method
Effective variation is structured, not random.
Operations should:
The goal is not confusion within Philippine operations. The goal is uncertainty for observers.
Controlled unpredictability maintains coordination while reducing exposure.
Interaction With Routine Presence
Variation does not replace routine presence.
Routine presence establishes continuity. Variation alters the details within that continuity. Together, they create a system that is active but not easily predicted.
This balance is critical. Pure unpredictability creates internal risk. Pure routine creates external vulnerability.
Documentation Under Variable Conditions
Variation must not degrade documentation.
Standard recording procedures must remain consistent even as operations change. Time, location, and behavior data must still be captured accurately.
Changing patterns should not result in incomplete records.
Limits and Constraints
Not all operations can vary freely.
Geography, weather, and equipment limitations restrict options. Some routes are fixed by necessity. Some schedules are tied to operational requirements.
Variation should be applied where it reduces risk without compromising mission success.
Bottom Line
In the West Philippine Sea, predictable operations are easier to disrupt. Variation introduces uncertainty that increases the cost of interference.
By adjusting timing, routes, and sequencing within a controlled framework, the Philippines can reduce vulnerability without escalation. The objective is not randomness. The objective is to remain effective while becoming harder to predict.
For more social commentary, please see Occupy 2.5 at https://Occupy25.com
References (APA)
Bateman, S. (2017). Maritime security and law enforcement in the South China Sea. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 39(2), 221–245.
Erickson, A. S., & Kennedy, C. (2016). China’s maritime militia. Center for Naval Analyses.
Permanent Court of Arbitration. (2016). The South China Sea Arbitration (Philippines v. China).
United Nations. (1982). United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.
#grayZoneConflict #maritimeOperations #MaritimeSecurity #operationalSecurity #PhilippineCoastGuard #southChinaSea #UNCLOS #WestPhilippineSea
West Philippine Sea Situation Report (SITREP): April 4-10, 2026
By Cliff Potts, CSO, and Editor-in-Chief of WPS News
Baybay City, Leyte, Philippines — April 12, 2026
Overview
From 00:01 April 4 to 23:59 April 10, 2026, Philippine time, the West Philippine Sea operational picture was defined less by a ship collision event and more by continued state presence, administrative consolidation on Pag-asa Island, Chinese radio and airspace pressure, and the steady civilian reality of life under constant surveillance. The clearest operational markers during the week were the April 9 activation of the Coast Guard District Kalayaan Island Group on Pag-asa Island and the same day’s Chinese flare use and radio challenges against a lawful Philippine Coast Guard aircraft operating over the Kalayaan Island Group (AP, 2026; GMA News, 2026a, 2026b; PIA, 2026a).
No publicly confirmed ship collision, water-cannon attack, or direct ship-to-ship ramming during the April 4-10 reporting window was identified in the official releases and major reports reviewed for this report. The week instead showed the continuing pattern Manila has been describing for months: persistent Chinese presence, repeated challenge procedures, and pressure applied in ways meant to normalize Chinese control claims while stopping short of open armed conflict (AP, 2026; GMA News, 2026a, 2026b; Xinhua, 2026).
Diplomatic Developments
No new bilateral settlement or deconfliction agreement was publicly announced during April 4-10. The week unfolded in the immediate wake of the March 28 resumption of the Philippines-China Bilateral Consultation Mechanism, where Manila said it raised incidents affecting Filipino personnel and fisherfolk and reaffirmed diplomacy, communication, and international law as the framework for dispute management (Reuters, 2026a).
Inside the Philippines, policy debate during the week also reflected diplomatic strain. BusinessWorld reported on April 6 that Stratbase Institute rejected renewed discussion of joint gas development with China, warning that any arrangement had to be consistent with the 2016 arbitral ruling and Philippine sovereign rights. That debate followed the DFA’s earlier statement that the two sides had held initial exchanges on possible joint gas exploration (BusinessWorld, 2026; Reuters, 2026a).
China’s clearest public diplomatic and political response inside the reporting window came on April 9, when a Chinese defense spokesperson said the Philippines was “stirring up maritime trouble,” accused Manila of intrusions into waters and airspace claimed by Beijing, and warned that China would continue taking “countermeasures.” That statement did not reduce tension. It formalized Beijing’s usual line while Philippine agencies proceeded with presence operations on the ground and in the air (Xinhua, 2026).
Maritime Activity (Surface)
The main Philippine surface-side development was the April 9 formal inauguration of the Coast Guard District Kalayaan Island Group on Pag-asa Island. According to the Philippine Information Agency, the unit was upgraded into a full district to allow broader command authority and faster response to maritime incidents, with plans for added ships, aircraft, personnel, and support for both patrol and civilian services. The Associated Press likewise reported that the command would be led by a commodore and backed by patrol ships and aircraft for law enforcement, monitoring, environmental protection, and search and rescue (PIA, 2026a; AP, 2026).
This was not a symbolic ribbon-cutting alone. Philippine officials described the command as a permanent step to maintain an organized and sustained coast guard presence around Pag-asa and nearby features. For a Philippines-first reading, that matters because presence is policy in the West Philippine Sea. China’s long-running method has been to keep ships, coast guard hulls, and militia-linked vessels in or near Philippine-claimed areas until routine presence itself becomes part of the pressure architecture (AP, 2026; PIA, 2026a).
Chinese surface activity remained part of the background environment even when exact weekly counts were not publicly broken out during this window. AP reported that Chinese coast guard and other government-linked ships frequently patrol waters off Thitu or Pag-asa, and Vice Mayor Maurice Albayda said residents see Chinese coast guard and militia ships around the island every day. That does not describe a one-day surge. It describes the ongoing normalization of gray-zone presence close to a populated Philippine outpost (AP, 2026).
Air Activity
Air activity was the sharpest security development of the week. On April 9, Chinese forces fired flares toward a Philippine Coast Guard Caravan aircraft conducting a maritime domain awareness flight over the Kalayaan Island Group, according to PCG spokesperson Rear Admiral Jay Tarriela as quoted by GMA News and ABS-CBN News. Philippine Navy spokesperson Rear Admiral Roy Vincent Trinidad said on April 10 that the action was “illegal, unprofessional, and unsafe” and identified the aircraft as operating near Panganiban Reef and Zamora Reef (GMA News, 2026b; ABS-CBN News, 2026; GMA News, 2026c).
GMA’s onboard report said the aircraft also received repeated radio challenges as it approached Pag-asa Island, and another GMA report counted three Chinese radio challenges during the approach. The flight nonetheless continued and landed safely. Taken together, those events show the current air pattern over the WPS: Manila flies lawful patrol and monitoring missions, while Chinese forces use radio warnings and hazardous signaling to impose a narrative of administrative control over occupied reefs and adjacent airspace (GMA News, 2026a, 2026b).
AP reported the flare incident happened on the same afternoon the new coast guard command was unveiled on Pag-asa. That timing matters operationally. It suggests that even as the Philippines improves local command and logistics, Chinese forces remain ready to contest Philippine movement not only at sea but also in the air corridor around major occupied features such as Subi and Mischief Reefs (AP, 2026).
Fisherfolk and Civilian Activity
Civilian activity in the reporting window centered on Pag-asa Island and the government’s effort to reinforce normal civilian life there. PIA reported on April 7 that the PCG backed “patriotic tours” to Pag-asa, with the local government promoting visits that would immerse participants in the lives of residents and uniformed personnel on the island. That is not tourism in the usual sense. It is a civilian-presence measure tied to sovereignty and public awareness (PIA, 2026b).
The Coast Guard district activation was also explicitly linked to residents’ daily needs. PIA said the government planned to improve facilities, funding, and personnel not only for maritime operations but also for education and health services. AP separately noted that about 400 Filipino civilians live on Pag-asa and quoted local officials saying Chinese ships remain a daily presence in surrounding waters. For fisherfolk and civilians, the practical issue is not only access to water. It is the need to live, fish, move, and receive services under continuous external monitoring (PIA, 2026a; AP, 2026).
No new fisherfolk harassment case dated within April 4-10 was confirmed in the reviewed sources. However, the Reuters account of the March 28 consultations said Manila had again raised incidents threatening Filipino fishermen, and AP’s on-island reporting described the continuing visibility of Chinese ships around Pag-asa. That is consistent with a week of constrained but continuing civilian and fishing activity rather than restored normal access free from pressure (Reuters, 2026a; AP, 2026).
Security Incidents
The most significant confirmed security incident in the reporting window was the April 9 flare use against the Philippine Coast Guard aircraft over the Kalayaan Island Group. Philippine officials characterized the act as dangerous and bullying; China answered by accusing the Philippines of provocation. The event did not produce a crash or physical injury, but it carried real aviation safety risk and showed that Chinese coercive tactics continue to extend into the air domain (GMA News, 2026b, 2026c; Xinhua, 2026).
A second, lower-level but still relevant incident type was radio challenge activity. GMA reported three such challenges against the PCG aircraft en route to Pag-asa on April 9. These are often treated as routine, but that is precisely the point: repetitive verbal challenge procedures are part of the wider effort to make Chinese claims sound administratively normal in areas where the Philippines is operating lawfully (GMA News, 2026a).
No confirmed use of water cannon, close-quarters hull collision, or reported fire-control radar targeting surfaced in the April 4-10 source set reviewed for this report. The week’s confirmed danger points were in the air and in the command-and-control space: flare use, radio challenges, and the public exchange of competing legal and operational narratives (AP, 2026; GMA News, 2026a, 2026b; Xinhua, 2026).
Weather and Sea Conditions
Weather did not appear to be the main operational constraint during the reporting window. PAGASA’s April 10 regional forecast for the Visayas and Palawan area showed partly cloudy to cloudy skies with isolated rainshowers or thunderstorms, light to moderate winds, and slight to moderate coastal conditions. PAGASA’s general forecast likewise placed the rest of Luzon and Visayas under slight to moderate coastal waters, or about 0.6 to 1.8 meters (PAGASA, 2026a, 2026b).
PAGASA also showed no gale warning in force at the time reviewed, which supports the view that major sea-state disruption was not the defining factor in this week’s WPS picture. A tropical cyclone, Typhoon Sinlaku, was being monitored outside the Philippine Area of Responsibility on April 10, but PAGASA’s published position placed it far east of northeastern Mindanao and not as a direct operational driver for the WPS during the April 4-10 window (PAGASA, 2026b, 2026c).
Seismic and Geophysical Activity
No PHIVOLCS tsunami advisory, volcanic bulletin, or other geophysical alert reviewed for this period showed a direct operational effect on West Philippine Sea patrols, fishing access, or civilian activity around Pag-asa and the Kalayaan Island Group. The PHIVOLCS earthquake and tsunami monitoring pages reviewed did not indicate a WPS-specific geophysical disruption during the reporting window (PHIVOLCS, 2026a, 2026b).
Assessment
The reporting window showed sustained pressure, not a discrete crisis spike. Philippine actions centered on consolidation: stronger local command on Pag-asa, continued lawful patrol and monitoring flights, and support for civilian life on a permanently occupied outpost. Chinese actions centered on contestation: daily ship presence around Pag-asa, radio challenges, public accusations, and flare use against a Philippine aircraft. That mix is consistent with the longer gray-zone pattern in which Beijing pressures Philippine presence without crossing into open combat, while Manila responds by making its own presence more regular, institutional, and visible (AP, 2026; GMA News, 2026a, 2026b, 2026c; PIA, 2026a; Xinhua, 2026).
For the Philippines, the week’s key lesson is plain: the contest is now administrative, civilian, maritime, and aerial at the same time. Pag-asa remains both a frontline community and a sovereignty platform. The activation of a full coast guard district improves response and visibility, but the April 9 flare incident also shows that China continues to test the cost and frequency of lawful Philippine movement in the area. This was a week of normalized coercion, not calm (AP, 2026; PIA, 2026a; GMA News, 2026b, 2026c).
References
ABS-CBN News. (2026, April 9). Tarriela: China fired flares at PCG aircraft in West PH Sea.
Associated Press. (2026, April 9). Philippines opens key coast guard base in the disputed South China Sea.
BusinessWorld. (2026, April 6). Think tank denounces PHL-China joint exploration plans.
GMA News. (2026, April 9). China issues radio challenges vs PCG aircraft en route to Pag-asa Island.
GMA News. (2026, April 9). First person: Chinese flares fired as Philippine Coast Guard plane passes WPS.
GMA News. (2026, April 10). Chinese flare use vs aircraft over WPS ‘illegal, dangerous’ — PH Navy.
PAGASA. (2026). Forecast weather conditions.
PAGASA. (2026). Gale warning.
PAGASA. (2026, April 10). Regional forecast: Visayas.
PHIVOLCS. (2026). Earthquake information.
PHIVOLCS. (2026). Tsunami information.
Philippine Information Agency. (2026, April 7). PCG backs “patriotic tours” to Pag-asa Island.
Philippine Information Agency. (2026, April 10). Coast Guard district launched on Pag-asa Island on Araw ng Kagitingan.
Philippine Information Agency. (2026, March 31). PBBM orders adoption of local names for 131 Kalayaan Island features in Palawan, WPS.
Reuters. (2026, March 28). Manila, Beijing resume talks on South China Sea, energy security.
Xinhua. (2026, April 9). Philippines’ attempts to stir up maritime trouble will backfire: spokesperson.
If this work helps you understand what’s happening, help me keep it going: https://www.patreon.com/cw/WPSNews
#ChinaCoastGuard #KalayaanIslandGroup #PagAsaIsland #PhilippineCoastGuard #SouthChinaSea #WestPhilippineSea #WPSSITREP
West Philippine Sea Situation Report (SITREP): March 28–April 4, 2026
By Cliff Potts, CSO, and Editor-in-Chief of WPS News
Baybay City, Leyte, Philippines — April 6, 2026
Overview
The main pattern during this reporting period was continued Chinese pressure in the West Philippine Sea paired with Philippine efforts to hold position diplomatically, administratively, and operationally. The clearest developments were the resumption of Philippines-China bilateral consultations on March 28, Chinese naval-air-coast guard patrol activity around Bajo de Masinloc on March 29, the Philippine government’s decision to adopt local names for 131 features in the Kalayaan Island Group, and new Philippine military reporting that at least 90 unauthorized Chinese vessels were monitored in the West Philippine Sea during March.
The period did not produce one single dominant collision or water-cannon event in public reporting the way some earlier weeks did. Instead, it showed the continued normalization of gray-zone operations: persistent Chinese presence, Philippine diplomatic protest, and slow but visible Philippine efforts to reinforce sovereignty through naming, mapping, patrols, and civilian presence.
Diplomatic Developments
On March 28, Manila and Beijing resumed high-level talks under their bilateral consultation mechanism, the first such meeting since January 2025. Reuters reported that the Philippines used the meeting to reiterate its legal positions, raise concerns over incidents affecting Filipino personnel and fishermen, and emphasize diplomacy, communication, and adherence to international law, while both sides also discussed possible oil and gas cooperation and other bilateral issues.
Philippine reporting on March 29 said the Department of Foreign Affairs raised concerns directly with China over actions in the West Philippine Sea during the Fujian meeting. That matters because Manila continued its now-familiar dual-track posture: talk to Beijing, but do not back away from formal objections or legal framing.
Diplomatic friction also rose after President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. ordered the adoption and use of Philippine names for 131 features in the Kalayaan Island Group through Executive Order No. 111, issued March 26 and reported publicly during this period. Chinese officials objected to the move and warned of possible countermeasures, while Philippine coverage framed the order as a sovereignty and administrative-control measure tied to naming, mapping, and chart publication.
Maritime Activity (Surface)
The most important maritime indicator this week was scale rather than spectacle. GMA News, citing Armed Forces of the Philippines reporting on March 31, said at least 90 unauthorized Chinese vessels were monitored in the West Philippine Sea in March. The largest concentration was reported at Bajo de Masinloc with 49 vessels, followed by Pag-asa with 15, Ayungin Shoal with 14, and Escoda Shoal with 12.
On March 29, Reuters reported that China publicly announced naval, coast guard, and air patrols around Scarborough Shoal, known in the Philippines as Bajo de Masinloc. Beijing described the patrols as countermeasures to what it called provocative acts. From the Philippine perspective, the practical effect was the same as before: continued Chinese assertion inside an area that lies within the Philippine exclusive economic zone.
Philippine Navy reporting on April 1 denied claims that China had conducted military drills near Bajo de Masinloc, saying what was observed was not a formal exercise but a dispersed presence of Chinese coast guard, navy, and air assets. That distinction matters because it reinforces the Philippine view that China’s sustained presence is routine coercive pressure, not an isolated exceptional event.
Air Activity
Air activity during the period was tied mainly to the March 29 Chinese patrol announcement around Bajo de Masinloc, which explicitly included air assets along with naval and coast guard units. Public reporting reviewed for this week did not show a major new Philippine aircraft flare incident on the scale of the March 20 Mischief Reef episode from the prior reporting window, but it did show that the air domain remains part of China’s regular pressure pattern around disputed features.
The Philippine Navy’s April 1 statement also referred to a dispersed presence of Chinese Air Force elements near Bajo de Masinloc rather than a single formal drill. Taken together, that suggests continued aerial support to maritime assertion operations rather than a break in tempo.
Fisherfolk and Civilian Activity
Fisherfolk remained central to the operational picture. Reuters reported that Manila raised incidents threatening Filipino fishermen during the March 28 bilateral talks, which means civilian livelihood activity remained part of the official diplomatic agenda rather than a side issue.
Philippine transparency and media posts circulating during the period continued to show Philippine Coast Guard and BFAR deployments to support fishermen around Bajo de Masinloc. One report said Philippine vessels and aircraft were used to safeguard roughly 40 to 50 Filipino fishermen while documenting the presence of Chinese coast guard and other Chinese maritime forces in the area.
Civilian assertion also took a more symbolic form. Public reporting during the period continued to highlight Kalayaan town’s planned “patriotic tours” to Pag-asa Island, intended to bring Filipinos physically into the space rather than leave it as a remote abstraction. That is not a military development, but it is part of the sovereignty contest.
Security Incidents
No single collision or water-cannon attack dominated this reporting period in the public sources reviewed. The more important security story was persistence: dense Chinese vessel presence across multiple Philippine-claimed areas, Chinese multi-domain patrols around Bajo de Masinloc, and continuing Philippine condemnation of what it described as aggressive and dangerous conduct during March.
On April 2, reporting on a National Maritime Council statement said the Philippines strongly condemned repeated aggressive actions by the China Coast Guard, People’s Liberation Army Navy, and Chinese maritime militia during March. Even without a fresh collision that day, the government’s language made clear that Manila sees the month’s activity as a sustained security problem, not a string of isolated misunderstandings.
Weather and Sea Conditions
Weather conditions were generally workable for maritime operations. PAGASA’s weekly outlook, issued March 27 and valid through April 3, said easterlies would bring partly cloudy to cloudy skies across most of the country, with only isolated rainshowers or thunderstorms in many areas. From March 30 to April 1, a ridge of high pressure affected northern Luzon, while from April 2 to April 3 fair weather generally continued, except for brief afternoon or evening rainshowers or thunderstorms in the eastern sections of Visayas and Mindanao.
PAGASA also showed no gale warning in effect during the period. That matters because sea-state conditions do not appear to have been the main constraint on patrols, fishing, or maritime presence this week.
Seismic and Geophysical Activity
No West Philippine Sea seismic event appears to have directly altered operations during the reporting period. The most notable regional geophysical event was the April 1 magnitude 7.6 earthquake in Indonesia’s Northern Molucca Sea. Reuters reported that tsunami threats initially issued for Indonesia, the Philippines, and Malaysia were later lifted, while PHIVOLCS issued tsunami information stating there was no destructive tsunami threat to the Philippines and that the advisory was for information purposes only.
On that basis, geophysical activity was relevant as a temporary regional alerting issue, but it did not become an operational driver in the West Philippine Sea during this reporting window.
Assessment
This was a consolidation week, not a breakthrough week. China sustained its maritime pressure, publicly displayed multi-domain patrol activity around Bajo de Masinloc, and maintained broad unauthorized presence across multiple contested areas. The Philippines answered with diplomacy, public attribution, sovereignty signaling through naming and mapping, and continued support to fishermen and civilian presence.
The larger point is straightforward. The contest is no longer just about headline incidents. It is about whether constant Chinese presence becomes accepted as normal, and whether the Philippines can keep enough patrol, legal, administrative, and civilian activity in place to prevent that normalization from hardening into political fact. This week, Manila kept doing that work, but the burden remains heavy and continuous.
References
ABS-CBN News. (2026, March 21). Kalayaan town to launch “patriotic tours” to Pag-asa Island in April.
ABS-CBN News. (2026, March 29). PH raises concern over China’s actions in West PH Sea at Fujian meeting.
ABS-CBN News. (2026, March 31). Not an escalation: NSC says China activities in West PH Sea part of standard operations.
ABS-CBN News. (2026, March 31). 131 features of Kalayaan Island Group to have local names.
ABS-CBN News. (2026, April 1). China opposes Philippines renaming Kalayaan Island Group features.
GMA News Online. (2026, March 31). 90 unauthorized Chinese vessels spotted in WPS in March 2026 — AFP.
Manila Bulletin. (2026, April 2). PH strongly condemns repeated aggression by Chinese maritime forces in WPS in March.
PAGASA. (2026, March 27). Weekly weather outlook.
PAGASA. (2026, April 4). Gale warning.
PHIVOLCS. (2026, April 1). Tsunami Information No. 1.
Philippine News Agency. (2026, April 1). PH Navy denies China drills near Bajo de Masinloc.
Presidential Communications Office / reported via GMA News and ABS-CBN News. (2026, March 26/March 31). Executive Order No. 111 ordering the adoption of local names for 131 Kalayaan Island Group features.
Reuters. (2026, March 28). Manila, Beijing resume talks on South China Sea, energy security.
Reuters. (2026, March 29). China conducts patrol around disputed South China Sea shoal.
Reuters. (2026, April 1). Indonesia earthquake damages buildings, but tsunami alerts have been lifted.
WPS Transparency Office / related Philippine Coast Guard-linked reporting. (2026, March-April). PCG and BFAR deployments supporting Filipino fishermen in Bajo de Masinloc.
If you read this and it matters, help me keep it going: https://www.patreon.com/cw/WPSNews
#BajoDeMasinloc #china #KalayaanIslandGroup #PhilippineCoastGuard #Philippines #SouthChinaSea #WestPhilippineSea
RAPPLER | Philippine & World News | Investigative Journalism | Data | Civic Engagement | Public InterestMar 20‘Cooperation’ between PH, China coast guards — why now?
RAPPLER | Philippine & World News | Investigative Journalism | Data | Civic Engagement | Public InterestMar 8Top 5 News This Week: Bong Suntay, 18 ‘ex-marines’, China’s Filipino spies
https://web.brid.gy/r/https://www.rappler.com/video/top-5-news-this-week/march-7-2026/
RAPPLER | Philippine & World News | Investigative Journalism | Data | Civic Engagement | Public InterestFeb 20Internal word war averted? PCG spox says he didn’t call DFA a ‘troll’
Death toll in MV Trisha Kerstin 3 sinking rises to 57 – PCG
WPS News
Bombo Radyo News