If there’s a serious lesson here, I hope it’s more than the obvious – that No Labels is a vanity project of very obscenely rich Americans who believe, contrary to all evidence, that there’s a broad appetite for a socially libertarian-ish, fiscally conservative-ish leader who somehow blends the best of the parties while winnowing out the worst of them.
#NoNoLabels #NeverNoLabels

No Labels is gone — but 'centrism' is never going away https://www.alternet.org/alternet-exclusives/no-labels-centrism/

No Labels is gone — but 'centrism' is never going away

No Labels announced earlier this month that it wouldn’t field a third-party presidential candidate, because it couldn’t identify one. “Americans remain more open to an independent presidential run and hungrier for unifying national leadership than ever before,” it said in a statement. Un hun.“But No...

Alternet.org
Chris Christie not ruling out No Labels bid

Former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie (R) is not ruling out running on a potential No Labels ticket in the 2024 presidential election. The former GOP presidential candidate, who dropped his White House bid in January, seemingly left the door open to a third-party run during an interview released Thursday with former Obama adviser David…

The Hill
Pelosi launches an all-out attack against No Labels

The former House speaker became the most high-profile Democrat to oppose the organization's bid.

POLITICO
A vote for No Labels is a vote for Trump.
#NeverNoLabels #NoNoLabels
No Labels Has Lost Another Potential 2024 Candidate, Because of Course https://newrepublic.com/post/179917/no-labels-lost-potential-2024-candidate-geoff-duncan
No Labels Has Lost Another Potential 2024 Candidate, Because of Course

Pretty much no one wants to work with No Labels. And why would they?

The New Republic
How No Labels’ Spoiler Bid Suddenly Entered Full Meltdown Mode

When Joe Manchin passed on a third-party run, it opened a window on a behind-the-scenes campaign to stop the centrist group from enabling Donald Trump’s return to the White House.

The New Republic

#WSJ #BillBarr #NoNoLabels #TraitorBarr #GOPTraitors #NeverNoLabels

A Campaign That Has the Tacit Approval of the White House to Keep People From Voting? You must be talking about the Republican fcking party, Bill Barr. 26-JAN-2024 https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a46551175/bill-barr-no-labels-editorial/

A Campaign That Has the Tacit Approval of the White House to Keep People From Voting?

You must be talking about the Republican fcking party, Bill Barr. 

Esquire
Who are No Labels' donors? Democratic groups file complaints in an attempt to find out

For months, No Labels has stockpiled cash and diligently worked to secure ballot access for a potential third-party presidential bid. That has struck fear among allies of Biden that the effort could siphon away votes and hand the White House to Trump.

PBS NewsHour

So much for democracy...

#NoNoLabels #NeverNoLabels #VoteBlueNoMatterWho

The No Labels party asked its supporters if they would pay $100 to help choose its 2024 nominee https://apnews.com/article/no-labels-poll-unity-ticket-5713de0765dcf4b1b5ec16fb2ee4088d

The No Labels party asked its supporters if they would pay $100 to help choose its 2024 nominee

The political organization No Labels has contemplated requiring a donation of at least $100 in order to cast a ballot at the group’s upcoming nominating convention. That's according to documents obtained by The Associated Press. The idea breaks from longstanding norms and would raise a significant hurdle to people who may take part in No Labels efforts to nominate a third-party candidate. Neither the Democratic or Republican parties charge to vote at their conventions. The possibility of requiring a donation was included in an internal survey No Labels conducted in September. No Labels officials said Friday that they could confirm no delegates will be charged to vote.

AP News